The discourse of counter-monuments: semiotics of material commemoration in contemporary urban spaces

Abstract

This article analyses strategies of material commemoration in contemporary urban spaces. Deploying a philosophical and socialtheoretical interpretation systematised by, in particular, Multimodal Critical Discourse Studies and its analysis of material commemoration, the article compares the semiotics of modes of commemorating through monuments and counter-monuments. As is argued, counter-monumental commemoration aligns much better than the traditionally static and non-dialogic monuments with the ongoing post-modern transformation and fluidity of contemporary urban spaces. By the same token, countermonuments also allow commemoration of complex and difficult past events -such as the Holocaust -that are traditionally surrounded by multiple interpretations and often-conflicting attempts to commemorate them. The analysis at the core of the paper looks in-depth at counter-monumental installations known as Stolpersteine, or Stumbling Blocks, developed since the early 1990s by the German artist Gunter Demnig as a form of commemoration of victims of National Socialism and especially the Holocaust. As is suggested, counter-monuments such as the Stolpersteine carry multiple meanings and have multiple functions which allow for diverse patterns of interaction with past/present. They also allow embedding the dialogue between forms of commemoration (monument/counter-monument) various recipients (locals/tourists, spectators/passers-by) as well as their varied interpretations and expectations of commemoration in the discourse of contemporary urban space.

Heykelin Politik Bir İmgeye Dönüşümü: Harburg Anıtı Örneği

“…Ayrıca, genellikle belirli bir yerde veya belirli bir zamanda öldürülen "herkesin" toplu anma törenlerinde olduğu gibi, mağdurları kişiselleştirmezler. Ayrıca anıtlar veya mezarlıklar gibi özel olarak tasarlanmış yerlerde anma töreni yapmazlar (Krzyżanowska, 2016).…”

Political monuments in Lithuania: Artistic aesthetics and national identity

“…Riegl 1903;Mitchell 2003;Benton-Short 2006;Shaya 2013;Kwai 2017). Scholars, such as Forest and Johnson (2002), Osborne and Osborne (2004), Merewether (1999), Buivydas (2011) and Krzyzanowska (2016) perceive monuments as essential for the legitimation and articulation of the national narratives through which political elites set dominant political agendas and legitimate political power. Thus, public places occupied by monuments are not neutral: usually they are intended to commemorate a particular person or historical event.…”

‘You can hear wholly only if you remove the waxes in your ears’: The Hararghe Oromo’s theory for establishing the intersubjective foundation of cognition

“…It is a voice of pain felt over the unjustifiability of historical processes that led to the creation of a state with exclusive and suppressive territorial and political authority (Murphy, 2010;Sassen, 2013). Looked at through the Foucauldian politics and epistemology of resistance (Krzyżanowska, 2016;Medina, 2011;Villarba-Torres, 2012), one can take it as a form of 'counter-memory'. Let alone this text which directly addresses a historically entrenched grievance, mirriiysa texts that appear to deal with issues of personal or interpersonal nature can serve as channels through which one can pitch a message of broader implication to the wider community.…”