2013
DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2012.746879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The discourse of entrepreneurial masculinities (and femininities)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
131
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
131
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, only those who subscribe to the underlying ideology are a success, those who cannot or will not subscribe are failures (Dannreuther and Perren, 2013). Members of marginalised groups such as women or ethnic minorities may be excluded where they engage in forms of enterprise not readily captured by the discourse, and therefore by surveys or other measures of entrepreneurial activity (Hamilton, 2013). This leads some to conclude that 'the concept of entrepreneurship seems to be discriminatory, gender-biased, ethnocentrically determined and ideologically controlled' (Ogbor, 2000: 629).…”
Section: Identity and Entrepreneurial Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only those who subscribe to the underlying ideology are a success, those who cannot or will not subscribe are failures (Dannreuther and Perren, 2013). Members of marginalised groups such as women or ethnic minorities may be excluded where they engage in forms of enterprise not readily captured by the discourse, and therefore by surveys or other measures of entrepreneurial activity (Hamilton, 2013). This leads some to conclude that 'the concept of entrepreneurship seems to be discriminatory, gender-biased, ethnocentrically determined and ideologically controlled' (Ogbor, 2000: 629).…”
Section: Identity and Entrepreneurial Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thus go beyond the previous typical framing of gender relations as biologically determined positions embodied by men and women (Nicholson, 1994) and propose that in addition to focusing on "women in family business", scholars should focus on "gender relations within the family firm", and how these relations are related to the ways individual family business members do identity work. As Hamilton (2013a) argues, in the family business literature and in the management literature in general, whenever the family and work life is examined with a gender lens, researchers tend to conceptualize these life spheres as conflicting because the starting point is the woman's motherhood and housekeeping duties (rather than work life). Hamilton (2013a) therefore calls for research that goes beyond the fairly simplistic and dualistic work-family balance issue, which only serves to reproduce the established notions of universal womanhood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may also be intersecting, which shape how habitats of meanings are negotiated and acted upon by individuals as they actively and continuously work out their identity in relation to others and as historically and socially embedded beings (Ashcraft, 2013;Ely & Padavic, 2007;Ybema et al, 2009). We recognize that notions of family and business themselves can take different meanings to different people at particular times (Hamilton, 2013a;Kondo, 1990).…”
Section: The Identity Work Framework and 'Habitats Of Meaning'mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The field of entrepreneurship is not alone in assuming a male experience as the norm. The same assumption is embedded in management studies and economics (Hamilton, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%