1998
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-49292-5_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Discovery of Rules from Brain Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are linear formulas of the form Since the naive approach always runs exponentially to complete the second step and becomes unrealistic in practice, a better algorithm is to generate terms from low order to high order while applying a pruning strategy. Experiments on artificial data showed: 94 (1) when there are no correlations between adjacent attributes, the accuracies are almost the same as the accuracies of C4.5, and (2) when there are strong correlations between adjacent attributes, the algorithm works better than C4.5 in terms of the accuracy of the result.…”
Section: Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results are linear formulas of the form Since the naive approach always runs exponentially to complete the second step and becomes unrealistic in practice, a better algorithm is to generate terms from low order to high order while applying a pruning strategy. Experiments on artificial data showed: 94 (1) when there are no correlations between adjacent attributes, the accuracies are almost the same as the accuracies of C4.5, and (2) when there are strong correlations between adjacent attributes, the algorithm works better than C4.5 in terms of the accuracy of the result.…”
Section: Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…92 Spatial-lattice models are often applied to image analysis; these techniques are often based on Markov random fields, with inference techniques based on various modifications of likelihood-maximization procedures. 93 Another alternative is to divide brain images into meshes, treat functions as classes and meshes as attributes, and find rules like 'A and B ) positive', which means if mesh A and mesh B are active, then some function is positive/on: 94 thus the problem can be reduced to supervised inductive learning. The usual inductive learning algorithms such as C4.5 95 do not work for this problem, however, because (1) there are strong correlations between attributes and (2) there are usually too many attributes (say 100 Â 100 = 10 000) and too few samples (say 100).…”
Section: Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key issues are how to design the psychological and physiological experiments for systematic obtaining various data from HIPS, as well as how to analyze and manage such data from multiple aspects for discovering new models of HIPS. Although several human-expert centric tools such as SPM (MEDx) have been developed for cleaning, normalizing and visualizing the fMRI images, researchers have also been studying how the fMRI images can be automatically analyzed and understood by using data mining and statistical learning techniques [43,45,66,70,96]. We are concerned with how to extract significant features from multiple brain data measured by using fMRI and EEG in preparation for multi-aspect data mining that uses various data mining techniques for analyzing multiple data sources.…”
Section: Fig 6 From Fmri/eeg Experiments To New Cognitive Wi Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their method can deal with the morphological variability that exists between subjects, and is scalable so that large longitudinal studies can be performed. Tsukimoto and colleagues developed a novel method for mining classification rules by dividing brain images into meshes as condition attributes, and treating functions as classes (Tsukimoto and Morita 1998). Thus, such rules as "if mesh A and mesh B are active, then some function is positive" can be found.…”
Section: On Multiple Brain Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%