2017
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The discrepancy between dynamical and theoretical mass in the triplet-system 2MASS J10364483+1521394

Abstract: We combine new Lucky Imaging astrometry from NTT/AstraLux Sur with already published astrometry from the AstraLux Large M-dwarf Multiplicity Survey to compute orbital elements and individual masses of the 2MASS J10364483+1521394 triple system belonging to the Ursa-Major moving group. The system consists of one primary low-mass M-dwarf orbited by two less massive companions, for which we determine a combined dynamical mass of M B+C = 0.48 ± 0.14 M . We show from the companions relative motions that they are of … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The J-band spectrum was corrected from the telluric contribution using a different standard star compared to the H+K band, and the only system in our sample to use different standard telluric stars for different bands. Calissendorff et al (2017) placed orbital constraints for the outer binary and estimated individual dynamical masses to be ≈0.24 M for each component. The theoretical model best-fit procedure suggests an effective temperature of T eff = 2900 K for each component, and a surface gravity of log g = 4.5 that is consistent with the individual spectral line analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The J-band spectrum was corrected from the telluric contribution using a different standard star compared to the H+K band, and the only system in our sample to use different standard telluric stars for different bands. Calissendorff et al (2017) placed orbital constraints for the outer binary and estimated individual dynamical masses to be ≈0.24 M for each component. The theoretical model best-fit procedure suggests an effective temperature of T eff = 2900 K for each component, and a surface gravity of log g = 4.5 that is consistent with the individual spectral line analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…has been made in recent years to enhance the characterisation of cool dwarfs, for mid-to late M types and for substellar objects (e.g. Bouy et al 2008;Bonnefoy et al 2009Bonnefoy et al , 2014Dupuy et al 2010;Schlieder et al 2014;Calissendorff et al 2017Calissendorff et al , 2019Calissendorff & Janson 2018). Furthermore, with the recent abundant discoveries of planets with M-star hosts (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This seems to be an overly complicated solution. The isochrones assume roughly solar composition, so a significantly different metallicity could cause a deviation from these isochrones, but this is not expected in the solar neighbourhood, and for example does not explain the case of J1036 BC, where a range of metallicities were tested in the models (Calissendorff et al 2017). One possible explanation is missing physics in the isochronal models, which might impose incorrect slopes or offsets in the isochrones.…”
Section: Isochronal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We detect the companions at projected separations of 14.82au and 17.78au, with the companions forming a nearly equal-mass binary at a projected separation of 0 15 (3 au). Calissendorff et al (2017) recently analyzed the orbits and masses of this known triple system.…”
Section: Triple Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%