2018
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project (DSHARP). VII. The Planet–Disk Interactions Interpretation

Abstract: The Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project (DSHARP) provides a large sample of protoplanetary disks having substructures which could be induced by young forming planets. To explore the properties of planets that may be responsible for these substructures, we systematically carry out a grid of 2-D hydrodynamical simulations including both gas and dust components. We present the resulting gas structures, including the relationship between the planet mass and 1) the gaseous gap depth/width, and 2) … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

50
635
10

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 450 publications
(695 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
50
635
10
Order By: Relevance
“…2), we expect exactly (or at least) one secondary gap in our locally isothermal simulation. The fact that we indeed observe it suggests that our results agree with Zhang et al (2018) in the locally isothermal limit. In addition, we observe the secondary gap at the location inferred by the fitting formula suggested in that study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…2), we expect exactly (or at least) one secondary gap in our locally isothermal simulation. The fact that we indeed observe it suggests that our results agree with Zhang et al (2018) in the locally isothermal limit. In addition, we observe the secondary gap at the location inferred by the fitting formula suggested in that study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Our results on HD 163296 can also be compared to the 2D locally isothermal simulations by Zhang et al (2018). In Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations