2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dispersal of protoplanetary discs – I. A new generation of X-ray photoevaporation models

Abstract: Photoevaporation of planet-forming discs by high energy radiation from the central star is potentially a crucial mechanism for disc evolution and it may play an important role in the formation and evolution of planetary systems. We present here a new generation of X-ray photoevaporation models for solar-type stars, based on hydrodynamical simulations, which account for stellar irradiation via a significantly improved parameterisation of gas temperatures, based on detailed photoionisation and radiation transfer… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
235
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(250 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
15
235
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, the accretion rate dramatically decreases (the so-called UV switch) and the inner disc is accreted on its own (shorter) timescale, producing a transition disc in ∼ 10 5 yr, in agreement with observational results (Ercolano et al 2011a). In recent years, attention has been paid also to other heating radiation fields such as the far ultra-violet (FUV) (Gorti & Hollenbach 2008) and soft X-rays (Alexander et al 2005;Ercolano et al 2008;Owen et al 2010;Picogna et al 2019), leading to the development of multiple photoevaporation models (see Alexander et al 2014 for a review) that differ in the mass-loss rates, the shape of the mass-loss profile and the link between the properties of the wind and the ones of the central star (such as the stellar UV or X-ray flux). In general, however, the more recent models tend to predict significantly higher mass-loss rates compared to the original EUV model.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…As a consequence, the accretion rate dramatically decreases (the so-called UV switch) and the inner disc is accreted on its own (shorter) timescale, producing a transition disc in ∼ 10 5 yr, in agreement with observational results (Ercolano et al 2011a). In recent years, attention has been paid also to other heating radiation fields such as the far ultra-violet (FUV) (Gorti & Hollenbach 2008) and soft X-rays (Alexander et al 2005;Ercolano et al 2008;Owen et al 2010;Picogna et al 2019), leading to the development of multiple photoevaporation models (see Alexander et al 2014 for a review) that differ in the mass-loss rates, the shape of the mass-loss profile and the link between the properties of the wind and the ones of the central star (such as the stellar UV or X-ray flux). In general, however, the more recent models tend to predict significantly higher mass-loss rates compared to the original EUV model.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…11 With increasing R, max(a 0 ) slowly decreases out to R max 140 AU, where it quickly drops to max(a 0 ) = 0. This coincides with the maximum radius at which XEUV photoevaporation is effective for the gas component of the disk; Picogna et al (2019) show that the surface mass-loss rate (Σ gas ) drops to negligible values at R ≈ 140 AU. So both gas and dust residing at the disk surface at R 140 AU are very unlikely to be thermally unbound from there.…”
Section: Maximum Entrained Grain Sizesupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Note that omitting disk gravity should not have a strong effect on the strength of the flaring seen here, see Appendix A.15 Picogna et al (2019) provide a more in-depth explanation of the differences between their model and that ofOwen et al (2011b).Article number, page 9 of 18 A&A proofs: manuscript no. Draft…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, the effects of the observed stellar XUV flux on the disc are expected to be significant. Models of X-ray photoevaporation show that an X-ray luminosity of L X = 5 × 10 29 erg s −1 produces a wind mass-loss rate ofṀ w ≃ 10 −8 M ⊙ yr −1 Owen & Jackson 2012;Picogna, et al 2019). The mass of gas in the PDS70 disc is not well-constrained, but for standard assumptions (i.e., a gas-to-dust ratio of 100) the disc models used to fit the dust observations imply a total disc mass M d 10 −2 -10 −3 M ⊙ (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%