The disruption of blockchain in auditing – a systematic literature review and an agenda for future research

Abstract

PurposeThis paper presents a systematic literature review, including content and bibliometric analyses, of the impact of blockchain technology (BT) in auditing, to identify trends, research areas and construct an agenda for future research.Design/methodology/approachThe authors include studies from 2010 to 2020 in their structured literature review (SLR), using accounting journals on the Scopus database, which yielded 40 articles with blockchain and auditing at its core.FindingsOne of the contributions of the authors’ analyses is to group the prior research, and therefore also the agenda for future research, into three main research areas: (1) Blockchain as a tool for auditing professionals to improve business information systems to save time and prevent fraud; (2) Smart contracts enabling Audit 4.0 efficiency, reporting, disclosure and transparency; (3) Cryptocurrency and initial coin offerings (ICOs) as a springboard for corporate governance and new venture financing. The authors’ findings have several important implications for practice and theory.Practical implicationsThe results of this study emphasise that (1) the disruption of blockchain in auditing is in a nascent phase and there is a need for compelling empirical studies and potential for the involvement of practitioners; (2) there may be a need to reconsider audit procedures especially suited for digitalisation and BT adoption; (3) standards, guidelines and training are required to pivot towards and confront the challenge BT will represent for auditing; and (4) there are two sides to the BT coin for auditing, enthusiasm about the potential and risk upon implementation. These practical implications can also be seen as a template for future research in a quest to align theory and practice.Originality/valueThe authors’ SLR facilitates the identification of research areas and implications, forming a useful baseline for practitioners, professionals and academics, as they draft the state of the art on the disruption of blockchain in auditing, highlighting how BT is changing auditing activities and traditions.

Embedding and managing blockchain in sustainability reporting: a practical framework

“…Building on this preliminary evidence, qualitative methods facilitate the comprehension of a complex and novel phenomenon, such as the implementation of blockchain systems in accounting practices (Bible et al , 2017; Lombardi et al , 2021; Schmitz and Leoni, 2019). In addition, non-financial reporting practices represent a subfield of accounting studies and professions.…”

“…In this regard, blockchain has become one of the main topics discussed by academics (Lombardi et al , 2021). First conceptualised by Nakamoto (2008), blockchain represents a disruptive technological innovation that has been widely explored by policymakers, academics and practitioners due to its originality and uniqueness.…”

“…Evaluating and comprehending the barriers to the adoption of blockchain systems in sustainable practices represents a novel field of study. In recent years, several authors have started to conceptualise the main constraints and opportunities related to the adoption of these practices by companies (Lombardi et al , 2021; de Villiers et al , 2021).…”

“…In this regard, blockchain has become one of the main topics discussed by academics (Lombardi et al, 2021).…”

The effects of person‐specific, task, and environmental factors on digital transformation and innovation in auditing: A review of the literature

“…Beyond its data reliability benefit, blockchain facilitates the trading of most cryptocurrencies and initial coin offerings that finance new ventures. These client innovation endeavors, especially for technology industry clients and new ventures, drive the auditor's requirement to understand and embrace these technologies (Lombardi et al, 2021). These endeavors also call for new Information Technology General Control (ITGC) considerations when auditors rely on these technologies for audit evidence (Sheldon, 2019; Vincent et al, 2020).…”