2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Disruptive Radiologist

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conflicting goals, interests, and incentives have led to a wide variety of misaligned behaviors (1). These behaviors can negatively affect or potentially negatively affect patient care (2). Therefore, preventing and managing disruptive behaviors are critical to optimizing performance.…”
Section: Sa-cme Learning Objectives Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conflicting goals, interests, and incentives have led to a wide variety of misaligned behaviors (1). These behaviors can negatively affect or potentially negatively affect patient care (2). Therefore, preventing and managing disruptive behaviors are critical to optimizing performance.…”
Section: Sa-cme Learning Objectives Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A private group in some cases may be able to punish the disruptive behavior of one of its providers with monetary penalties, additional call duty, decreased vacation time, or termination of employment. 2 However, in the event of an egregious act such as a sexual attack or other assault, the provider may need to be immediately suspended pending further review. In serious and/or persistent cases of disruptive behavior, especially if collegial discussions are not effective in changing the situation, the medical executive committee needs to get involved quickly.…”
Section: Remediationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore important that disruptive behavior by a provider be addressed as soon as possible, preferably immediately. 1,2 Typically for physicians, if disruptive behavior is not first addressed and changed by members of the team or peers in 1 or more conversations, then the individual should be spoken to by the departmental chairperson, chief medical officer, medical affairs vice president, and/or the chief of staff. If the departmental chairperson is the point person, it is often wise to have one of the other aforementioned officials present as well, especially if it is anticipated that the discussion will be heated and/or if the departmental chair and the disruptive individual have a history of negative interactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Letters of reference have been shown to not be a reliable way to identify potential problem physicians [38], likely an effect of selection bias. There was significant interest in utilizing emotional intelligence scores during residency interviews as a predictor for future success; however, studies have shown mixed results [39][40][41].…”
Section: Vignettes In Patient Safety -Volumementioning
confidence: 99%