Genre in a Changing World 2009
DOI: 10.37514/per-b.2009.2324.2.09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dissertation as Multi-Genre: Many Readers, Many Readings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…While the designers of the scales in this corpus likely feel that an overt acknowledgment of the contingency of the traits they are mandated to assess would constitute a validity threat to an “objective” appraisal of writing, writers’ experience of shifting standards and rationales for the many appraisals they have already received by the time they enter FYC has likely convinced them of the subjectivity of reader response already. More to the point, this contingency will simply be a fact of life in writing in the disciplines (Abasi, Akbari, & Graves, 2006; Russell & Yanez, 2003), postgraduate writing (Paré, Starke-Meyerring, & McAlpine, 2009), and workplaces (Dias, Freedman, Medway, & Paré, 1999) to come. Scales that rhetorically construct trait descriptions and performance categories in ways that are consistent with (rather than in defiance of) the fact that any reader’s appraisal is embedded in cultural and material contexts could help furnish postsecondary writers with more robust constructs of “writing” for the contradictions and transitions to come.…”
Section: Discussion: the Contemporary Theoretical Construct Of Writinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the designers of the scales in this corpus likely feel that an overt acknowledgment of the contingency of the traits they are mandated to assess would constitute a validity threat to an “objective” appraisal of writing, writers’ experience of shifting standards and rationales for the many appraisals they have already received by the time they enter FYC has likely convinced them of the subjectivity of reader response already. More to the point, this contingency will simply be a fact of life in writing in the disciplines (Abasi, Akbari, & Graves, 2006; Russell & Yanez, 2003), postgraduate writing (Paré, Starke-Meyerring, & McAlpine, 2009), and workplaces (Dias, Freedman, Medway, & Paré, 1999) to come. Scales that rhetorically construct trait descriptions and performance categories in ways that are consistent with (rather than in defiance of) the fact that any reader’s appraisal is embedded in cultural and material contexts could help furnish postsecondary writers with more robust constructs of “writing” for the contradictions and transitions to come.…”
Section: Discussion: the Contemporary Theoretical Construct Of Writinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, in the context of elt, undergraduate or masters' students write their theses for a very small audience and under the guidance of a supervisor. However, the practices that occur around the genre development are occluded (Autrey & Carter, 2015;Swales, 1996); and it is difficult to know exactly how this genre is learned and taught (Paré et al, 2009). However, it is to be expected, as Coffin et al (2003) point out, that the relationship between the supervisor and supervisees exerts some influence on the way writing takes place in higher education, particularly in a crucial document such as the thesis.…”
Section: Master Thesis Writing As a Social Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dissertation-related genres, and the dissertation itself, also invoke the complexity of hybrid genres (Swales, 2004). The dissertation is a genre that might be read by multiple audiences, generating a “multiplicity” of “rhetorical demands” (Paré, Starke-Meyerring, & McAlpine, 2009), which is notable when genre hybridization occurs in the case of integrated or article-based dissertations. In these dissertations, one might find reference to dissertation chapters while the text in the “chapters” (which are in fact articles) refers to the “paper” or other term indicating the manuscripts status as article (Swales, 2004, pp.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%