“…While the designers of the scales in this corpus likely feel that an overt acknowledgment of the contingency of the traits they are mandated to assess would constitute a validity threat to an “objective” appraisal of writing, writers’ experience of shifting standards and rationales for the many appraisals they have already received by the time they enter FYC has likely convinced them of the subjectivity of reader response already. More to the point, this contingency will simply be a fact of life in writing in the disciplines (Abasi, Akbari, & Graves, 2006; Russell & Yanez, 2003), postgraduate writing (Paré, Starke-Meyerring, & McAlpine, 2009), and workplaces (Dias, Freedman, Medway, & Paré, 1999) to come. Scales that rhetorically construct trait descriptions and performance categories in ways that are consistent with (rather than in defiance of) the fact that any reader’s appraisal is embedded in cultural and material contexts could help furnish postsecondary writers with more robust constructs of “writing” for the contradictions and transitions to come.…”