2016
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.16-01-0081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dissertation House Model: Doctoral Student Experiences Coping and Writing in a Shared Knowledge Community

Abstract: The Dissertation House model provides a voluntary, supplementary professional development activity that expands single-mentor and single-department approaches to create shared learning communities with multiple mentors across several academic disciplines. We find that participating in the Dissertation House increases the likelihood of retention and graduation for PhD candidates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…PROMISE provides URM graduate students with opportunities to connect with peers from several institutions in activities such as Dissertation House, the Research Symposium, and the Summer Success Institute that support graduate student retention and professional growth (Tull et al, 2012). A strength of the PROMISE program is its ability to connect students with additional support mechanisms such as additional faculty mentors and peers from their own and other institutions, many of whom share some of the students' identities (Carter-Veale, Tull, Rutledge, & Joseph, 2016;Tull et al, 2012). Table 1 provides descriptive data on our four participating institutions, which range in graduate student population from 690 to 10,614.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PROMISE provides URM graduate students with opportunities to connect with peers from several institutions in activities such as Dissertation House, the Research Symposium, and the Summer Success Institute that support graduate student retention and professional growth (Tull et al, 2012). A strength of the PROMISE program is its ability to connect students with additional support mechanisms such as additional faculty mentors and peers from their own and other institutions, many of whom share some of the students' identities (Carter-Veale, Tull, Rutledge, & Joseph, 2016;Tull et al, 2012). Table 1 provides descriptive data on our four participating institutions, which range in graduate student population from 690 to 10,614.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, "Preparing Future Faculty" (PFF) and "Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate" expose upper-level graduate students to different institutional types (Lynch & Sears, 2011), provide opportunities for students to develop their teaching skills (Purdy et al, 2003), and provide supportive networks of faculty and peers (Carter-Veale et al, 2016). Through these programs, students "try on" the roles of faculty (McCord et al, 2014), and learn about the range of faculty responsibilities (teaching, research, and service).…”
Section: Socializing Practices That Influence Intentions For Faculty mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Так, иностранными авторами дан анализ современного состояния и перспектив развития докторских программ в системе европейского пространства высшего образования 3 [14]. Также учеными подробно изучены особенности подготовки профессиональных исследователей в современных условиях [15]; взаимосвязь между удовлетворенностью процессом обучения и качеством исследовательского образования [16]; вопросы организации приема и аттестации обучающихся [17]; карьерные перспективы выпускников [18]. В контексте нашей работы представляет интерес организационная модель магистратуры как первого этапа подготовки высококвалифицированных научных работников, реализованная в университетах Франции [19].…”
Section: обзор литературыunclassified