1993
DOI: 10.1021/bi00090a007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dissimilatory sulfite reductase from Desulfosarcina variabilis is a desulforubidin containing uncoupled metalated sirohemes and S = 9/2 iron-sulfur clusters

Abstract: The active site of Escherichia coli NADPH-sulfite reductase has previously been modeled as a siroheme with its iron bridged to a nearby iron-sulfur cubane, resulting in antiferromagnetic exchange coupling between all iron atoms. The model has been suggested to hold also for other sulfite reductases and nitrite reductases. We have recently challenged the generality of the model with the finding that the EPR of Fe/S in dissimilatory sulfite reductase (desulfoviridin) from Desulfovibrio vulgaris indicates that an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cofactor quantification of dSiRs is quite disparate, with studies reporting from 2 to 4 sirohemes and from 10 to 32 non-heme irons per ␣ 2 ␤ 2 module (13,(17)(18)(19)(20). The nature of the catalytic cofactor has also been disputed, with some studies proposing a cubanesiroheme arrangement similar to that found in aSiRs (13,19) and other studies proposing the presence of higher nuclearity high spin iron-sulfur clusters (18,20,21). Finally, a most important and unresolved question is the nature of the physiological electron donor to dSiR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cofactor quantification of dSiRs is quite disparate, with studies reporting from 2 to 4 sirohemes and from 10 to 32 non-heme irons per ␣ 2 ␤ 2 module (13,(17)(18)(19)(20). The nature of the catalytic cofactor has also been disputed, with some studies proposing a cubanesiroheme arrangement similar to that found in aSiRs (13,19) and other studies proposing the presence of higher nuclearity high spin iron-sulfur clusters (18,20,21). Finally, a most important and unresolved question is the nature of the physiological electron donor to dSiR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a sulfite reductase of the desulforubidin-type was detected spectroscopically in the cytoplasmic fraction after separation from interfering cytochromes by chromatography. The absorption spectrum of the purified protein exhibited a maximum at 545 nm, typical of sulfite reductases of the desulforubidin-type (Lee et al 1973;Arendsen et al 1993); in addition, further characteristic peaks were observed at 279, 396, and 580 nm (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Cytological and Physiological Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…According to this analysis, the enzyme was 98% pure. The enzyme preparation was highly purified also on the basis of UV/Vis spectroscopy; the purity indices were 3.77 (398 nm/545 nm), and 0.5 (398 nm/280 nm), in comparison to 3.65 (398 nm/545 nm), and 0.35 (398 nm/545 nm) for desulforubidin from Desulfosarcina variabilis (Arendsen et al 1993). Desulfoviridins of two Desulfovibrio vulgaris strains have been shown previously to resolve into two (Seki et al 1979) or three (Wolfe et al 1994) distinct forms during anion-exchange chromatography.…”
Section: Cytological and Physiological Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of enzymes were purified by published procedures : Ni-hydrogenase from Alcaligenes eutrophus (soluble NAD+-reducing enzyme; cells were obtained from G. Haverkamp and C. G. Friedrich, Dortmund, Germany;Schneider et al, 1979;Friedrich et al, 1982); Ni-hydrogenase from C. vinosum (strain DSM 185) (Coremans et al, 1992b); Fe-hydrogenase ( Van der Westen et al, 1978) and prismane protein (Stokkermans et al, 1992) from D. vulgaris (Hildenborough); dissimilatory sulfite reductase from Desulfbsarcinu variabilis (Arendsen et al, 1993); ferredoxin from Megadphaera elsclenii (Gillard et al, 1965); and rubredoxin from Pyrococcus furiosus (Blake et al, 1991).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%