2007
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2006.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Distally Based Sural Artery Flap for Ankle and Foot Coverage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have shown good results with the use of this flap [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] . Because several errors are common during the learning phase of this technique, describing these errors may improve the initial results and may support the continued use of this flap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown good results with the use of this flap [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] . Because several errors are common during the learning phase of this technique, describing these errors may improve the initial results and may support the continued use of this flap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parts affected, dimensions of the flap (rather than the pedicle) and overall complications.plate, so complications occurred only in 4 patients out of the[17].Also, a recent meta-analysis reviewed by Follmar et al,in 2007, reported that 82% of RSSAF heal without any flap-related complications[18].During our study, venous congestion occurred in only 25% of cases, all of them were treated conservatively. These results disagree with the results of Kristoffer, in 2015 who reviewed treatment of 27 patients using RSSAF.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…But it is not a good match for the defects of posterior heel as it is more bulky, insensate, usually leaves long linear scars cutting across the ankle and skin grafting is needed in calf region. 7 Simple method like skin grafting may also be useful in specific situations but it often leads to unacceptable results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%