2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.06.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distinct element method (DEM) and the extended finite element method (XFEM) application for analysis of interaction between hydraulic and natural fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 The first trend focuses on improving the computational aspects of the models by employing state-of-the-art numerical techniques to develop models that overcome the limitations of their existing counterparts. Examples are studies that employed different variations of the boundary integrals method, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] finite element method, [12][13][14][15][16] extended/generalized finite elements, [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] phase field methods, [31][32][33][34][35][36] and hybrid finite element/eXtended finite element-distinct element techniques (FEM-DEM or XFEM-DEM) [37][38][39][40] to develop 2D and 3D HF models. Additionally, some recent studies have coupled boundary integral or extended finite element methods with fracture tip asymptotes and presented efficient multiscale models of HFs under different propagation regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The first trend focuses on improving the computational aspects of the models by employing state-of-the-art numerical techniques to develop models that overcome the limitations of their existing counterparts. Examples are studies that employed different variations of the boundary integrals method, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] finite element method, [12][13][14][15][16] extended/generalized finite elements, [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] phase field methods, [31][32][33][34][35][36] and hybrid finite element/eXtended finite element-distinct element techniques (FEM-DEM or XFEM-DEM) [37][38][39][40] to develop 2D and 3D HF models. Additionally, some recent studies have coupled boundary integral or extended finite element methods with fracture tip asymptotes and presented efficient multiscale models of HFs under different propagation regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less computational cost and lower time consumption is another major advantage ANN have over other numerical methods of HF-NF interaction studies.) Propagation of multiple HFs' interaction with induced and pre-existing natural fractures using extended finite element method (XFEM) (Mikaeili and Schrefler 2018;Milanese et al 2018) was investigated and modeled by Taleghani and Olson (2011) and Wang et al (2018c), while Ghaderi et al (2018a) utilized Coupled DEM and XFEM.…”
Section: Methods Of Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Zheng et al [27] used XFEM to study the interaction between hydraulic and natural fractures, and the results showed that the approach angle and stress difference had a predominant effect on the reactivation of natural fractures as compared to the other parameters. In addition, it has been proposed to combine XFEM with CZM or other methods to simulate fracture propagation [28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%