2008
DOI: 10.1127/lr/18/2008/193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distribution and abundance of the Neogobius fishes in their native range (Bulgaria) with notes on the non-native range in the Danube River

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
54
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is highly unlikely, however, that the species had been able to overcome the distance between Croatia and Slovakia in this time without being recorded in central Hungarian waters. Indeed, the very low numbers caught near Baja suggest the early precursors of a slow naturally advancing population (Polačik et al, 2008). First records of the species in Austrian waters occur in 1994, when specimens were recorded at rkm 1899 in a backwater near Regelsbrunn, close to the Slovak border (Spindler and Chovanec, 1995;Zweimüller et al, 1996).…”
Section: > Bighead Goby Ponticola Kessleri (Günther 1861)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is highly unlikely, however, that the species had been able to overcome the distance between Croatia and Slovakia in this time without being recorded in central Hungarian waters. Indeed, the very low numbers caught near Baja suggest the early precursors of a slow naturally advancing population (Polačik et al, 2008). First records of the species in Austrian waters occur in 1994, when specimens were recorded at rkm 1899 in a backwater near Regelsbrunn, close to the Slovak border (Spindler and Chovanec, 1995;Zweimüller et al, 1996).…”
Section: > Bighead Goby Ponticola Kessleri (Günther 1861)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, no verifying samples of bighead goby were caught in the Hungarian stretch until 1996/97, and those from upstream of Budapest (Erös and Guti, 1997;Molnár and Baskar, 1998), at around the same time as its discovery in Slovak waters (Kautman, 2000;Stránai, 1997). In 2005, the species was registered as common throughout both the Croatian and Slovak stretches of the Danube (Polačik et al, 2008), and low numbers were caught near Baja (rkm 1490), in the south of Hungary . It is highly unlikely, however, that the species had been able to overcome the distance between Croatia and Slovakia in this time without being recorded in central Hungarian waters.…”
Section: > Bighead Goby Ponticola Kessleri (Günther 1861)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their range expansion from a formerly static natural distribution was first observed during the 1960s (Bănărescu 1970), and quite recently this fish reached the Slovakian section of the Danube River (Polacik et al 2008). In 2008, the presence of monkey goby was confirmed on the German Rhine at the port of Duisburg (Stemmer 2008), and in 2009 in the Dutch Rhine (van Kessel et al 2009), probably having migrated downstream.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The apparent lack of comparable methods to describe population structure and reproductive characteristics calls for up-to-date standardised studies. Recently, longitudinal distribution, density and habitat preference were described by Polacik et al (2008) and Polačik et al (2008) along the lower Danube (native distribution; Bulgarian stretch); however, no other characteristics (e.g., population structure, reproduction, feeding habits) important for successful colonisation were investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%