2006
DOI: 10.3119/04-16.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distribution and habitat preferences of introduced species in the Mount Holyoke Range, Hampshire Co., Massachusetts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The species has been shown to be linked to past land-use history (Lundgren et al, 2004;Searcy et al, 2006), and thus may be more commonly associated with old-field white pine sites. However, our survey shows Japanese barberry has become more important in the pure hardwood cover type (that were likely formerly old-field pine stands), and has been documented as a common component in eastern deciduous forests (Ehrenfeld, 1997).…”
Section: Amphicarpaea Bracteatamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The species has been shown to be linked to past land-use history (Lundgren et al, 2004;Searcy et al, 2006), and thus may be more commonly associated with old-field white pine sites. However, our survey shows Japanese barberry has become more important in the pure hardwood cover type (that were likely formerly old-field pine stands), and has been documented as a common component in eastern deciduous forests (Ehrenfeld, 1997).…”
Section: Amphicarpaea Bracteatamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Both theory and empirical evidence suggest that disturbance to the forest canopy increases the frequency and magnitude of exotic invasion (Rejmánek, 1989;Hobbs and Huenneke, 1992;Knapp and Canham, 2000;Webb et al, 2001;Vankat and Roy, 2002;Watkins et al, 2003;Lundgren et al, 2004;Mandryk and Wein, 2006;Searcy et al, 2006;Belote et al, 2008;Eschtruth and Battles, 2009). While both natural and anthropogenic disturbances occur in forests, they differ in that the timing, size, frequency, and intensity of the latter can be controlled, perhaps in such a way as to minimize invasion (Burnham and Lee, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…While buckthorn is considered moderately shade tolerant (Frappier et al 2003a) and is known to invade both disturbed habitats (Johnson et al 2006;Searcy et al 2006) and younger ''successional'' forests (Frappier et al 2003a(Frappier et al , b, 2004Webster et al 2006), it may be unable to survive and persist as a stand matures. Moreover, that buckthorn prefers nutrient rich soils (Wingard 2007) may make it vulnerable to competition for nutrients, which may (Tilman 1988;Riegel et al 1995) or may not (Pacala et al 1996) increase in late successional stands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%