1951
DOI: 10.2307/3796579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Distribution and Production of Muskrats on the Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These spatiotemporal patterns in conjunction with high house densities suggest that the cumulative impacts of local muskrat disturbances at a landscape scale can be substantial. While published investigations of large‐scale ecological changes caused by muskrat activity are rare, studies by Alexander and Radway (1951) in Montezuma Wildlife Refuge, New York, and Danell (1978) in northern Sweden documented extensive changes in wetland vegetation associated with high muskrat density. Therefore, it is likely that our findings of strong local effects of muskrat disturbance on wetland plant diversity and community composition were amplified at a landscape level in the wetlands with high muskrat densities and long‐term longevity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These spatiotemporal patterns in conjunction with high house densities suggest that the cumulative impacts of local muskrat disturbances at a landscape scale can be substantial. While published investigations of large‐scale ecological changes caused by muskrat activity are rare, studies by Alexander and Radway (1951) in Montezuma Wildlife Refuge, New York, and Danell (1978) in northern Sweden documented extensive changes in wetland vegetation associated with high muskrat density. Therefore, it is likely that our findings of strong local effects of muskrat disturbance on wetland plant diversity and community composition were amplified at a landscape level in the wetlands with high muskrat densities and long‐term longevity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%