2016
DOI: 10.1088/0951-7715/29/9/2856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distribution of 3D superconductivity near the second critical field

Abstract: Abstract. We study the minimizers of the Ginzburg-Landau energy functional with a constant magnetic field in a three dimensional bounded domain. The functional depends on two positive parameters, the Ginzburg-Landau parameter and the intensity of the applied magnetic field, and acts on complex valued functions and vector fields. We establish a formula for the distribution of the L 2 -norm of the minimizing complex valued function (order parameter). The formula is valid in the regime where the Ginzburg-Landau p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(68 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is complementary to the results in [14] and [19] devoted respectively to the regimes b > 1 (surface superconductivity) and b → 1 − (bulk superconductivity near H C 2 ) for three dimensional superconducting samples.…”
Section: ḣ1supporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is complementary to the results in [14] and [19] devoted respectively to the regimes b > 1 (surface superconductivity) and b → 1 − (bulk superconductivity near H C 2 ) for three dimensional superconducting samples.…”
Section: ḣ1supporting
confidence: 78%
“…This problem is related to the one of the Abrikosov state near the critical field H C 2 := κ , where the transition to the normal state in the bulk occurs. This is visualized in the regime b → 1 − in (1.7) and is analyzed in many papers, [3,12,18,19]. The same difficulty is encountered when trying to detect the vortices by the methods of Sandier-Serfaty, so that the analysis is shifted to the distribution of the density |ψ| 2 instead.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof is reminiscent of the method used by the second author in [26,Sec. 4] (see also [27]). We assume that B 0 (x 0 ) > 0.…”
Section: Sharp Upper Bound On the L 4 -Normmentioning
confidence: 99%