1965
DOI: 10.1017/s0031182000068785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distribution of a primary infestation of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis in the small intestine of laboratory rats

Abstract: The small intestine of rats was divided into twenty sections in a reproducible manner in order to study the distribution of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis by stretching it under a tension of 5g in adrenaline saline.A small but significant difference between the distribution of parasites in male and female rats was observed.As larvae had virtually ceased to reach the intestine by the fifth day all changes in distribution after that day were due to movements of the established adult population.Up to the twelfth da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
1
1

Year Published

1966
1966
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The entire small intestine was rapidly removed, and arranged in a long dissecting tray which was filled with ice-cold saline. The bottom of the tray was marked out on a bias grid, adapted after Bramble (1965), so that equivalent regions of the intestines of different rats could be compared, irrespective of the actual intestinal lengths.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entire small intestine was rapidly removed, and arranged in a long dissecting tray which was filled with ice-cold saline. The bottom of the tray was marked out on a bias grid, adapted after Bramble (1965), so that equivalent regions of the intestines of different rats could be compared, irrespective of the actual intestinal lengths.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following are examples of helminths which appear to reach sexual maturity in the sites initially occupied by their immature stages, and without any major change: Acanthocephala, P o~~o r p h u s minutus (Crompton & Whitfield, 1968 b ;Lingard & Crompton, 1972); Cestoda, Echinococcus granulosus (Smyth, Gemmell & Smyth, 1970), Hydatigera taeniaeformis (Hutchison, 1959) and Hymenolepis exigua (Alicata & Chang, 1939) ; Nematoda, Ancylostoma caninum (Krupp, 1961)) Trichinella spiralis (Larsh & Hendricks, 1949)) Strongyloides ratti and S. venexuelensis (Wertheim, 1970), Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (Brambell, 1965 ; Alphey, 1970)) Syphacia obvelata (Philpot, 1924)) Physaloptera hispida (Schell, 1952)) Obeliscoides cuniculi (Alicata, 1932), Haemonchus contortus (Veglia, 1915 ;Stoll, 1929) and Trichuris muris (Fahmy, 1954) ; Trematoda, Loxogmes arcanum (Crawford, 1938)) Haplometrana utahmis (Olsen, 1937), Psilostomum ondatrae (Beaver, 1939), Echinoparyphium recurvaturn (Soulsby, 1955) and Alaria canis (Pearson, 1956).…”
Section: (I) Direct Arrivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, adult T. colubriformis were harvested from the small as well as the large intestine of both single-infection and challengeinfection groups. Such posterior delocalisation of nematodes has been reported in other host models such as T. colubriformis in sheep (Wagland et al 1996), guinea pigs (Connan 1966) and rabbits (Bezubik et al 1988); T. vitrinus in sheep (Bendixsen et al 1995); Nippostrongylus brasiliensis in rats (Brambell 1965); and Trichinella spiralis in mice (Larsh et al 1952). Dierent parasitic stages of the nematodes invading the intestinal mucosa act as a trigger for generation of the host immunological response (Anderson and Michel 1977).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%