2000
DOI: 10.1108/00483480010295934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distribution of Belbin team roles among UK managers

Abstract: Ascertains the preferred team roles of a substantial sample of UK managers using Belbin's model. Finds that co-ordinators and resource investigators are present in great numbers, but few completers, monitor evaluators, plants and shapers are encountered. Highlights the significance of this finding for firms seeking to create balanced and, hopefully, optimallystructured teams. Adduces some evidence for the validity of the Belbin team role construct.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their theory suggests that to the extent team members have a diversity of role propensities there will be a better team balance, and thereby they will be more effective. Yeh, Wei, Wei, and Lei (2012) advanced a mathematical model to depict the advantages of such balance, but empirical research has been equivocal (e.g., Fisher, Hunter, & Macrosson, 2000; Senior, 1997).…”
Section: Models Of Team Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their theory suggests that to the extent team members have a diversity of role propensities there will be a better team balance, and thereby they will be more effective. Yeh, Wei, Wei, and Lei (2012) advanced a mathematical model to depict the advantages of such balance, but empirical research has been equivocal (e.g., Fisher, Hunter, & Macrosson, 2000; Senior, 1997).…”
Section: Models Of Team Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing research casts doubt on both the psychometric properties and criterionrelated validity of the BTRSPI (Dulewicz, 1995;Fisher, Hunter, & Macrosson, 1998, 2000Furnham et al, 1993aFurnham et al, , 1993bPritchard & Stanton, 1999;Senior, 1997Senior, , 1998. Analyses of item functioning, factor structure, convergent and divergent validity, scale reliabilities, and concurrent and predictive validity have all produced, at best, only ambiguous support for both the BTRSPI and Belbin's underlying model.…”
Section: Construct Validity and Adverse Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, more support exists for the Belbin team role model (e.g. Fisher et al, 1994;Dulewicz, 1995;Fisher et al, 2000), which assesses the potential for team role contribution of individuals based on behaviours and clusters of characteristics (Belbin, 1981). The main criticisms of Belbin question the identification of an individual's preferred team roles based on self-perception alone (Parkinson, 1995;Senior, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%