1967
DOI: 10.1007/bf01119445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distribution of coolant velocities and wall stresses in closely packed rods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with the geometry parameter for Reynolds numbers Re < 10 6 the curvature of the wall (7)(8)(9)(10)(11). Results obtained on annuli by Brighton and Jones [12] showing a dependence of the velocity profile on the curvature of the wall do not agree with measurements by Quarmby [18].…”
Section: O;mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with the geometry parameter for Reynolds numbers Re < 10 6 the curvature of the wall (7)(8)(9)(10)(11). Results obtained on annuli by Brighton and Jones [12] showing a dependence of the velocity profile on the curvature of the wall do not agree with measurements by Quarmby [18].…”
Section: O;mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis leading to equation (2) implies that on a symmetry line the wall shear stress can be calculated directly from the pressure gradient and the passage geometry. A more rigorous expression for equation (1) would be:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interest in and clarification of this work reflected by the comments is appreciated. In response to Dr. Rowe's comment, we note that the static pressure results were measured at only one plane, L/D H = 182 which was assumed based on the results of references [1,2,8] to be at fully-developed conditions. The pressure variation at this plane is so slight that for axial flow analysis, the assumption of constant pressure along the 6 direction is a good assumption.…”
Section: Additional Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Friction stress calculation (Re = 1.9´10 5 )[2]; (2, 3) deterministic calculation of friction stress (2) and planned velocity diagram (3) (Re = 0.9´10 5 )[13];(4,5) experimental data at Re = 0.95´10 5[7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%