1976
DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(76)90101-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distribution of fetal death control mice and its implications on statistical tests for dominant lethal effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
2

Year Published

1978
1978
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Haseman and Soares [3] considered the distribution of fetal death in three large groups of control mice, and found that the Poisson and binomial models provided poor fits to these data. Table 1 below (taken from the Haseman and Soares paper), the observed distribution of fetal death in these three groups has been compared to what would be expected assuming an underlying Poisson or binomial model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Haseman and Soares [3] considered the distribution of fetal death in three large groups of control mice, and found that the Poisson and binomial models provided poor fits to these data. Table 1 below (taken from the Haseman and Soares paper), the observed distribution of fetal death in these three groups has been compared to what would be expected assuming an underlying Poisson or binomial model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage dominant lethal frequency (%LDF) was calculated from the mean number of live implants (LI) per pregnant female in the experimental (exp) and negative control (con) groups using the formula %LDF = [1 -(LI exp x 1-LI con -1 )] x 100 (Haseman and Soares, 1976), which takes into consideration the rates of spontaneous lethal dominants present in the negative control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact results are expected to be useful for the calculation of standard errors of the maximum likelihood estimates of the beta-binomial parameters and those of the Dirichlet-multinomial parameters for data that arise in practice in toxicology and other similar fields. Standard errors of the maximum likelihood estimates of the beta-binomial parameters and those of the Dirichlet-multinomial parameters, based on the exact and the approximate Fisher information matrix, are obtained for three sets of data from Haseman and Soares (1976) and a dataset from Mosimann (1962). There is substantial difference between the standard errors of the estimates based on the exact Fisher information matrix and those based on the approximate Fisher information matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the three datasets of Haseman and Soares (1976), in which the purpose was to study the mutagenic effect, the number of clusters are 524, 1328 and 554. In dataset I the cluster sizes vary from 1 to 20, in dataset II cluster sizes vary from 1 to 13 and in dataset III cluster sizes vary from 1 to 18.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%