The distribution of full income in Greece

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. www.econstor.eu The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E SIZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. ABSTRACT The Distribution of Full Income in Greece *Non-cash incomes from either private or public sources can have substantial effects on the distribution of economic welfare. However, standard approaches to inequality measurement either neglect them or take into account only selected non-monetary items. Using data for Greece in the mid 2000s we show that it is possible to incorporate a comprehensive list of non-monetary components into the analysis of income inequality. The results indicate that inequality declines sharply when we move from the distribution of disposable monetary income to the distribution of full income, that includes both cash and non-cash incomes. Both private and public non-cash incomes are far more equally distributed than monetary income, but the inequality-reducing effect of publicly provided in-kind services is stronger. The structure of inequality changes when non-cash incomes are included in the concept of resources, but the effects are not dramatic. Non-cash incomes appear to accrue more heavily to younger and older individuals, thus reducing differences across age groups.JEL Classification: D31, I38

The Dark Side of the Crisis: Disparities in per Capita income (2000–12) and the Urban‐Rural Gradient in Greece

“…). As a matter of fact, in the last decade the capital region became the most advanced area in Greece for high‐return economic sectors such as real estate, telecommunications, banking and financial services (Koutsampelas & Tsakloglou ). Our results are in line with the study by Capello et al .…”

“…The highest increase was observed during the time period between 1999 and 2007. The increase of inequality is driven by two forces: leading regions further increase their lead over time and lagging regions fall further behind (Koutsampelas & Tsakloglou ). As a result of the asymmetric economic development during the last three decades, the Greek urban system is highly polarised being centred on Attica region (concentrating more than 30 per cent of country's population) which includes the metropolitan area of Athens (more than 3 million inhabitants).…”

Increasing Income Inequality in the Nordics

“…First, since most public services are produced by public institutions we only observe expenditures and not prices. Thus, this study draws on standard practice by assuming that the total value of these services 2 For previous studies on the impact of in-kind benefits on the income distribution, see O'Higgins and Ruggles (1981), Gemmell (1985), Smeeding (1986), Smeeding et al (1993), Evandrou et al (1993), Ruggeri et al (1994), Slesnick (1996), Antoninis and Tsakloglou (2001), Aaberge and Langørgen (2006), Garfinkel et al (2006), Callan et al (2008), , , Aaberge, Langørgen and Lindgren (2010, Vaalavuo (2011), Verbist et al (2012), and Koutsampelas and Tsakloglou (2013). is equal to the total costs of producing them.…”

The Distribution of Economic Resources to Children in Germany

“…Another large strand of literature deals with the evaluation of public in-kind benefits, such as public education, public health services, or public housing, and investigates its distributional impact on disposable incomes (recent studies are, e.g., Garfinkel et al, 2006;Paulus et al, 2010;Koutsampelas and Tsakloglou, 2013;Higgins et al, 2015). 3 In general, all studies find substantially lower levels of disposable income inequality whenever the income concept is extended by the value of public in-kind benefits.…”