2016
DOI: 10.1111/jen.12347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distribution of Athetis lepigone and prediction of its potential distribution based on GARP and MaxEnt

Abstract: Athetis lepigone (Möschler) is a new agronomic pest which has caused serious damages to summer maize in China. In order to effectively monitor it, it is necessary to carry‐out a worldwide investigation on its potential geographical distribution. In this study, we give two ecological niche models, Genetic Algorithm for Rule‐set Production and Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt), to predict the potential geographical distribution of A. lepigone. The results indicate that the suitable areas for A. lepigone are mainly in Chi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Athetis lepigone is an important Eurasian and polyphagous agricultural pest with more than 30 species of host plants (e.g., maize, pepper, and wheat; Fu et al, 2014; Wang et al, 2017). The larvae attack bud leaves or drill deep into young prop roots and tender stems in maize, causing severe damage to summer maize in the Northern China Plain (Jiang et al, 2011; Ma et al, 2012; Shi et al, 2011; Wang et al, 2017; Zhang et al, 2011). The adults can undertake seasonal migrations covering long distances (Fu et al, 2014), but their feeding habits remain largely unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Athetis lepigone is an important Eurasian and polyphagous agricultural pest with more than 30 species of host plants (e.g., maize, pepper, and wheat; Fu et al, 2014; Wang et al, 2017). The larvae attack bud leaves or drill deep into young prop roots and tender stems in maize, causing severe damage to summer maize in the Northern China Plain (Jiang et al, 2011; Ma et al, 2012; Shi et al, 2011; Wang et al, 2017; Zhang et al, 2011). The adults can undertake seasonal migrations covering long distances (Fu et al, 2014), but their feeding habits remain largely unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species distribution models (SDMs) have become a prominent tool to predict and evaluate species distributions (Pearson et al, 2007;Elith and Leathwick, 2009;Xu et al, 2012). Different types of SDMs are developed according to the ecological niche, among which maximum entropy (MaxEnt) is widely used (Elith et al, 2006;Wang et al, 2017). MaxEnt acquires the maximum entropy of species distribution and constructs an SDM to predict species' potential distribution based on the species distribution coordinates and environmental variables (Araujo et al, 2005;Phillips et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent applications include predicting distributions of different species, such as the invasive species (e.g., pignut in India Padalia, Srivastava & Kushwaha, 2014 and creeping oxeye in Central America, Qin et al, 2015), modeling bird abundance patterns (Martínez-Meyer et al, 2013), endangered bird species (Montenegro et al, 2017), and ecological niche of tree species (Prakash Singh et al, 2013), and delineating disease risk areas by estimating the geographical distribution of pathogens (Barro et al, 2016;Chikerema et al, 2017) and vector species (Ramsey et al, 2015;Sloyer et al, 2018;Lippi et al, 2019). Other research compares GARP with some other ENMs (especially MaxEnt) to show how species distributions change using different approaches to provide reliable predictions (Padalia, Srivastava & Kushwaha, 2014;Wang et al, 2017;Ray, Behera & Jacob, 2018), to compare the predictive performance of different methods (Khatchikian et al, 2011;Zhu & Peterson, 2017), or to understand why the differences in the performance exist (Elith & Graham, 2009). Therefore, it is of primary importance to revisit GARP and better understand what biological information can be obtained from rule-set development during the modeling process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%