2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2011.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distribution of immune cells and macrophages in the endometrium of women with recurrent reproductive failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although they were initially reported as absent in proliferative endometrium based on histochemical stains to detect cytoplasmic granules, CD56+ cells are detectable, albeit in relatively low numbers . The increase in numbers is seen from day 22 onwards (Russell et al 2011(Russell et al , 2013, and at least some of the increase can be accounted for by local proliferation. The phenotype of uNK cells in non-pregnant endometrium has not been investigated to the same extent as those from early pregnancy decidua, where distinct gestational age differences in phenotype and function have been reported.…”
Section: Relationship Of Unk Cells In Non-pregnant Endometrium and Dementioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although they were initially reported as absent in proliferative endometrium based on histochemical stains to detect cytoplasmic granules, CD56+ cells are detectable, albeit in relatively low numbers . The increase in numbers is seen from day 22 onwards (Russell et al 2011(Russell et al , 2013, and at least some of the increase can be accounted for by local proliferation. The phenotype of uNK cells in non-pregnant endometrium has not been investigated to the same extent as those from early pregnancy decidua, where distinct gestational age differences in phenotype and function have been reported.…”
Section: Relationship Of Unk Cells In Non-pregnant Endometrium and Dementioning
confidence: 95%
“…between zona spongiosum and zona compactum), an initial step should be to establish consistent methodology for quantifi cation of uNK cell numbers in endometrium (Lash et al 2014 ). Furthermore, the date of assessment may vary from LH+6 to LH+9 in different studies, refl ecting a cycle stage when uNK cell numbers can vary dramatically (Russell et al 2011(Russell et al , 2013. It is essential that sampling is on a specifi c day of the cycle or that 'normal' ranges for uNK cell numbers are established in large subject groups.…”
Section: Clinical Applications Of Unk Assessment In Recurrent Reprodumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31][32][33] In humans, ovulation and rising ovarian P4 production promote a marked increase in leukocyte numbers, elevating them to 40% of all endometrial cells in the mid-late secretory phase of the menstrual cycle. 31 This gain in leukocyte numbers is primarily due to the accumulation of uterine natural killer (uNK) cells. In mice, uNK cell numbers also increase dramatically during development of decidua basalis, while increases in macrophages, monocyte-derived cells and dendritic cells are more prominent in the underlying myometrium.…”
Section: Decidua Basalis-recruiter Of Selected Specialized Immune Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numbers of uNK cells increase exponentially as the menstrual cycle progresses (Bulmer & Lash 2005;Russell et al 2011;Russell et al 2013) and therefore timing ofthe biopsy is critical or a reference range of 'normal' uNK cell numbers throughout the menstrual cycle needs to be established. However, before this can be addressed a method which provides consistency between different centres is required and this study has addressed this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also no clear definition of a "normal range" of uNK cell numbers, partly because obtaining endometrium from normal fertile control women is difficult. In addition, for practical reasons many centres sample over a 3 day period (LH+6-LH+8 or LH+7-LH+9), but during this time 100 period uNK cell numbers increase exponentially (Russell et al 2011;Russell et al 2013), which may skew clinical results dependent on the "reference range" being used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%