1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0248(97)00327-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distribution of inclusions in synthetic quartz

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The QWI process could in-duce large blue-shift but will also introduce damages to material while ion implantation is carried out. [5,6] In contrast, as a simpler mutation from butt-joint, bundle integrated waveguide (BIG) takes the advantage of large blue-shift, low loss, small vertical divergence angle, simplicity of fabrication and so appears to be an elegant monolithic integration solution, because BIG involves only one step selective removal of the active core in passive region, which is followed by a non-selective epitaxial growth all over the wafer with relatively good butt-joint interface. [7] Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QWI process could in-duce large blue-shift but will also introduce damages to material while ion implantation is carried out. [5,6] In contrast, as a simpler mutation from butt-joint, bundle integrated waveguide (BIG) takes the advantage of large blue-shift, low loss, small vertical divergence angle, simplicity of fabrication and so appears to be an elegant monolithic integration solution, because BIG involves only one step selective removal of the active core in passive region, which is followed by a non-selective epitaxial growth all over the wafer with relatively good butt-joint interface. [7] Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%