2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-021-00616-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distribution of runs of homozygosity in the genome of river and swamp buffaloes reveals a history of adaptation, migration and crossbred events

Abstract: Background Water buffalo is one of the most important livestock species in the world. Two types of water buffalo exist: river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis bubalis) and swamp buffalo (Bubalus bubalis carabanensis). The buffalo genome has been recently sequenced, and thus a new 90 K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) bead chip has been developed. In this study, we investigated the genomic population structure and the level of inbreeding of 185 river and 153 swamp buffaloes using runs of homozygosit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned by Biscarini et al [16], few studies aimed to evaluate the impact of different parameters on ROH detection, with such parameters still not well established. This de nition is of crucial importance, as it has a direct effect on the results obtained [23]; not only in ROH detection, but also in the secondary analyses (e.g., inbreeding coe cient based on ROH).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned by Biscarini et al [16], few studies aimed to evaluate the impact of different parameters on ROH detection, with such parameters still not well established. This de nition is of crucial importance, as it has a direct effect on the results obtained [23]; not only in ROH detection, but also in the secondary analyses (e.g., inbreeding coe cient based on ROH).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed two linear mixed models to evaluate the statistical significance of the difference between the ROH parameters identified for each population group [ 23 ] using the statistical software JMP 16 [ 24 ]. We modelized two variables ( ): (i) a standardized ratio between the length of single ROH in each individual and the length of the corresponding chromosome , and (ii) a standardized ratio between the number of ROH on each chromosome of each individual and the length of the chromosome ; both of these models included the same factors: where is the mean, is the fixed effect of the autosome (chromosomes 1 to 29), is the fixed effect of the population group (CSD vs NRD), is the fixed effect of the breed nested within the population groups (n = 20 in CSD and n = 10 in NRD), is the interaction between population group and autosome, is the random effect of the animal, and is the random residual.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a population with high inbreeding levels for a long time, such as Line 1 Hereford, the effects of inbreeding depression could be moderate because of selection against deleterious alleles in the population [ 31 ]. As an illustration of that in a bubaline population, Macciota et al [ 32 ] used ROH islands to identify genes associated with environmental adaptation, fitness, and reproduction. In this sense, positive and negative inbreeding may counterbalance, leading to small or no inbreeding depression, as found by Sumreddee [ 7 ] for reproduction traits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies with ROH in dairy cattle have shown that chromosomal ROH vary widely [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. Similarly, in beef cattle the contributions of different chromosomes also fluctuate [ 7 , 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%