2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-020-1588-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Distribution of Time Delays Between Nanoflares in Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have predicted a range of periodicities for nanoflares (Viall & Klimchuk 2011;Bradshaw et al 2012;Klimchuk 2015) depending on parameters, such cooling rates. Utilizing MHD simulations of the time intervals between nanoflare reconnection events, Knizhnik & Reep (2020) found a power law distribution, similar to the conclusion of Eastwood et al (2009) for Type III storms. The time intervals we observed between acceleration events are very consistent over intervals of many days, and thus not explainable by a process resulting in a power law distribution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Studies have predicted a range of periodicities for nanoflares (Viall & Klimchuk 2011;Bradshaw et al 2012;Klimchuk 2015) depending on parameters, such cooling rates. Utilizing MHD simulations of the time intervals between nanoflare reconnection events, Knizhnik & Reep (2020) found a power law distribution, similar to the conclusion of Eastwood et al (2009) for Type III storms. The time intervals we observed between acceleration events are very consistent over intervals of many days, and thus not explainable by a process resulting in a power law distribution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These models and observational considerations typically find nanoflare energy distributions with power laws of −2.5 α −1.5. However, recent MHD simulations tracking discontinuities in field line tracing by Knizhnik & Reep (2020) suggest nanoflares with time delay and energy powerlaws with α ≈ −1. Consequently, our models test heating event power laws with α = −1 and α = −2.5.…”
Section: Power Law Slopes Of Event Delaysmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One suggested energy source for coronal heating is photospheric motions, which add stress and energy into the coronal magnetic field. The magnetic field then reconnects and converts its stored magnetic energy into heat as a series of localized, rapid heating events, termed 'nanoflares' (Parker 1983(Parker , 1988Klimchuk 2006Klimchuk , 2015Knizhnik et al 2018Knizhnik et al , 2019Knizhnik & Reep 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, Knizhnik & Reep (2020) studied the question of nanoflare frequencies using MHD simulations of a driven Parker (1972) plane-parallel magnetic field between two plates. Their coronal magnetic field was driven by twisting motions on one plate, and held fixed and unmoving on the other plate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%