2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2017.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distributional effect of commuting subsidies - Evidence from geo-referenced data and a large-scale policy reform

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mechanism is thought to especially affect ethnic minorities (see, e.g., Gabriel and Rosenthal 1996, Boustan and Margo 2009, Zenou 2013. The heterogeneity in the take-up of commuting deductions between different ethnic groups that we document also adds a new angle to studies of the distributional effects of commuter subsidies (see Heuermann et al 2017 for a recent contribution).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 57%
“…This mechanism is thought to especially affect ethnic minorities (see, e.g., Gabriel and Rosenthal 1996, Boustan and Margo 2009, Zenou 2013. The heterogeneity in the take-up of commuting deductions between different ethnic groups that we document also adds a new angle to studies of the distributional effects of commuter subsidies (see Heuermann et al 2017 for a recent contribution).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 57%
“…The resulting longer commutes lead to the excessive use of transportation systems and, subsequently, negative externalities such as congestion (Wheaton, 1998;Brueckner, 2000), the fragmentation of natural habitats, and soil sealing (European Environment Agency, 2006). Similar to Zenou (2000), Heuermann et al (2017) further emphasize that subsidizing commuting through a tax system with progressive income taxes favors high-income and urban individuals, thereby fostering financial inequality. Additionally, by enabling households to be less locally bound, Bayer and McMillan (2012) show that reducing commuting costs can lead to increased racial, educational, and income segregation.…”
Section: Related Literature and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For the Netherlands, van Ommeren et al ( 2000 ) and van Ommeren ( 2005 ) find a marginal willingness to pay for an additional kilometer of commuting of 0.15 euros per day or 17 euros for one additional hour of commuting (van Ommeren and Fosgerau 2009 ). With regard to compensation by the employer, Heuermann et al ( 2016 ) find that employers compensate only few employees directly for additional commuting costs. Hence, the decision to commute is mainly an individual one, which can be strongly influenced by prior experiences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%