2016
DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-7787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Distributional Impact of Taxes and Transfers in Poland

Abstract: The Policy Research Working Paper Series disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development issues. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. The papers carry the names of the authors and should be cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of the International Ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In a similar way, those already poor are made poorer ( . 35 For Poland, see Goraus and Inchauste (2016). For Croatia, see Inchauste and Rubil (2017 The poverty effect shows a mixed picture across countries.…”
Section: Results: Distributional Impact Of the Net Fiscal System Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar way, those already poor are made poorer ( . 35 For Poland, see Goraus and Inchauste (2016). For Croatia, see Inchauste and Rubil (2017 The poverty effect shows a mixed picture across countries.…”
Section: Results: Distributional Impact Of the Net Fiscal System Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goraus and Inchauste (2016) estimated that the poverty and inequality in Poland will fall as a result of the introduction of the Family 500+ program. Indirect taxes were also expected to increase, but the net effect on disposable income was estimated to be positive, relative to the situation in 2014 (Goraus and Inchauste, 2016).…”
Section: Universal Basic Income In Light Of Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The scheme consists of 500 PLN monthly transfer for every second and subsequent child under 18 years of age, regardless of income; one-child families face a means-test of per-capita net income of 800 PLN (1200 PLN if the child has disability), fully withdrawn above the threshold (MRPiPS, 2017). The transfer does not affect means-tested family benefit eligibility and contributes to lowering income inequality, relative and child poverty (Brzezinski & Najsztub, 2016;Goraus & Inchauste, 2016). Opposition parties raised objections regarding the fiscal sustainability of the measure, costed in 2017 at over 23 billion PLN, whereas other cash benefits combined amount to 11.4 billion PLN (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Care Provision: Leavesmentioning
confidence: 99%