showed that treatment with bumetanide or placebo had no significant effect on BPRS score in patients, F(1, 24) = 0.062, P = 0.805. Similar to previous reports, 2 assessment of treated patients 2 months after bumetanide intake revealed that both bumetanide and placebo had no serious side-effects based on a prepared checklist.These study data have some limitations. First, the effect of bumetanide on patients with schizophrenia was not investigated on a specific symptom. Second, the dose of bumetanide 2 mg/day may be inadequate to show biological effects. Further studies are required to address these issues and to show the actual effect of bumetanide on schizophrenia. Fifteen patients (3 men and 12 women; age: 55.9 AE 13.9 years) receiving HBO 2 treatment for their underlying illnesses (maxillary osteomyelitis, n = 9; radiation injury, n = 2; spinal canal stenosis, n = 4) were recruited to this study after their informed consent was obtained. The anonymity of patients was preserved throughout the study. Sleep quality indices were calculated using the Japanese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-J), 3 the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (JESS), 4 the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and actigraphy. Each of the 15 subjects was tested before starting the first HBO 2 treatment (pre) and after no more than five (short) treatments. Nine subjects were also tested after 20 (long) HBO 2 treatments. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENTFollowing the short treatment, we observed an overall improvement in sleep indices, as indicated by significant improvements in the total PSQI-J score (pre: 7.7 vs short: 6.3, P = 0.041), in addition to significantly lower sleep onset latency (pre: 1.8 vs short: 1.1, P = 0.013), which was consistent with the actigraphy results (pre: 10.1 min vs short: 6.2 min, P = 0.016). Following the long treatment, we observed significant improvements in the total PSQI-J score (pre: 7.7 vs long: 5.0, P = 0.016), sleep quality (pre: 1.5 vs long: 0.9, P = 0.025), and daytime dysfunctions subscales (pre: 0.7 vs long: 0.3, P = 0.025), as well as in the total JESS score (pre: 8.3 vs long: 5.7, P = 0.037). We used the VAS to assess fatigue and pain, and observed a significant improvement in fatigue after both short (P = 0.009) and long HBO 2 treatments (P = 0.035), and in pain after the long treatment (P = 0.018) but not after the short treatment.With regard to the better sleep indices observed after the long treatments, we cannot exclude the possibility that this improvement is mediated by the alleviation of their original symptoms, primarily pain, rather than having a direct effect on sleep itself. However, the shorter sleep onset latency observed after the short treatment appears to be the immediate effect of HBO 2 treatment rather than an indirect effect, as the pain had not subsided in the short treatment period. Although this preliminary study is limited by the lack of a control group, our findings suggest that HBO 2 is a potential novel therapeu...