2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Divergence of Wear Propagation and Stress at Steep Acetabular Cup Positions Using Ceramic Heads and Sequentially Cross-Linked Polyethylene Liners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…62 In contrast, the results of Shankar et al 63 found that the finite element simulation of the ZrO 2 femoral head with the UHMWPE acetabulum under frictional mating was about 0.1 mm 3 per 1 million gait cycles, which is closer to the volume wear of the UHMWPE acetabulum predicted by the present method under one year of normal gait walking. Also in the study by Zietz et al, 64 the wear per million cycles of the XLPE acetabulum at 37°C synovial fluid temperature obtained by the hip simulator was about 3.35 mm 3 , which is about 6 times higher than the 0.568 mm 3 volumetric wear at 37°C that we obtained by finite element calculations. Compared with existing studies, the predicted values of 1 million volume wears obtained by numerical simulation are to some extent able to explain the frictional heat-induced wear at the acetabular interface of the artificial hip joint.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…62 In contrast, the results of Shankar et al 63 found that the finite element simulation of the ZrO 2 femoral head with the UHMWPE acetabulum under frictional mating was about 0.1 mm 3 per 1 million gait cycles, which is closer to the volume wear of the UHMWPE acetabulum predicted by the present method under one year of normal gait walking. Also in the study by Zietz et al, 64 the wear per million cycles of the XLPE acetabulum at 37°C synovial fluid temperature obtained by the hip simulator was about 3.35 mm 3 , which is about 6 times higher than the 0.568 mm 3 volumetric wear at 37°C that we obtained by finite element calculations. Compared with existing studies, the predicted values of 1 million volume wears obtained by numerical simulation are to some extent able to explain the frictional heat-induced wear at the acetabular interface of the artificial hip joint.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…Experimental hip simulators are not ideal for performing parametric studies, and therefore we developed a numerical wear simulation using finite element analysis (FEA). The use of FEA [ 14 , 15 , 16 ] to validate, check, or contrast experimental data [ 17 , 18 ] about wear rate has been used and improved from the beginning of the use of computational techniques, with reasonable accuracy of outcomes [ 19 ]. Recently, studies have combined 2D and 3D axisymmetric approaches to understand the strain energy density in metallic implants [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%