2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The diversification and financial performance of US credit unions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
172
0
18

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
12
172
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of papers have analysed small credit institutions focusing on performance (Goddard et al, 2008a;Kontolaimou and Tsekouras, 2010), diversification (Goddard et al, 2008b;Lepetit et al, 2008;Mercieca et al, 2007, Mckillop andWilson, 2011), risk of failure (Fiordelisi and Mare, 2013) and ownership structure (Gorton and Schmid, 1999 (Hesse and Cihák, 2007;Ayadi et al, 2010) providing empirical evidence that cooperative banks are more stable than commercial banks as they have a great deal of soft information (which is hard to collect) on the creditworthiness of members/customers, and therefore less likely to make lending mistakes. Furthermore, size appears to be positively related to systemic risk (Vallascas and Keasey, 2012;De Jonghe, 2010) and the majority of cooperative banks are small rural credit institutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of papers have analysed small credit institutions focusing on performance (Goddard et al, 2008a;Kontolaimou and Tsekouras, 2010), diversification (Goddard et al, 2008b;Lepetit et al, 2008;Mercieca et al, 2007, Mckillop andWilson, 2011), risk of failure (Fiordelisi and Mare, 2013) and ownership structure (Gorton and Schmid, 1999 (Hesse and Cihák, 2007;Ayadi et al, 2010) providing empirical evidence that cooperative banks are more stable than commercial banks as they have a great deal of soft information (which is hard to collect) on the creditworthiness of members/customers, and therefore less likely to make lending mistakes. Furthermore, size appears to be positively related to systemic risk (Vallascas and Keasey, 2012;De Jonghe, 2010) and the majority of cooperative banks are small rural credit institutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data seem to suggest that the variables capturing a credit union's size, financial strength and potential for growth may be particularly relevant to a choice of the service menu. A careful examination of the credit union literature suggests considering the following variables: the number of current and potential members, equity capital, 25 reserves and the leverage ratio, defined as the ratio of total debt to total assets (Bauer, 2008;Bauer et al, 2009;Goddard et al, 2002Goddard et al, , 2008. 26 These are the variables entering the selection equations.…”
Section: Framework and Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study utilized return on assets ROA (Lahovnik, 2011;Ravichandran et al, 2009), return on equity ROE (Delios & Beamish, 1999;Goddard et al, 2008), Tobin's q, and price to book value (P/B Value) as four indicators of performance. ROA provides measurement regarding total profit produced by every dollar invested in assets (Ross, Westerfield, Jaffe, & Jordan, 2011).…”
Section: Measurement Of Objective Corporate Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A diversified company could naturally outperform a focused one through tactics like predatory pricing or price cutting (Goddard, McKillop, & Wilson, 2008;Klier, 2009), cross subsidization (Johnson et al, 2008;Lee, 2002), mutual forbearance (Bernheim & Whinston, 1990;Martin & Eisenhardt, 2001), and reciprocity (George, 2007;Palich et al, 2000). In particular, related diversifiers could gain benefits through backward and forward integration strategies (David, 2011;Gupta et al, 2007) as opposed to unrelated diversifiers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%