52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2014
DOI: 10.2514/6.2014-0080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The DLR Flow Solver TAU - Status and Recent Algorithmic Developments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Viscous-wall no-slip boundary condition is strongly imposed. A detailed discussion is offered in Kroll, Langer & Schwöppe (2014). Steady base-flow solutions are obtained using the backward Euler method with lower-upper symmetric Gauss-Seidel iterations and local time stepping.…”
Section: Numerical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viscous-wall no-slip boundary condition is strongly imposed. A detailed discussion is offered in Kroll, Langer & Schwöppe (2014). Steady base-flow solutions are obtained using the backward Euler method with lower-upper symmetric Gauss-Seidel iterations and local time stepping.…”
Section: Numerical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, these coefficients are calculated here for several angles of attack using the numerical code TAU. 15 The geometries of the capsules investigated in this work were defined by Airbus DS in Les Mureaux, France, as candidate shapes for the entry and return capsule of the sample return mission MarcoPolo-R, 16 which was previously proposed to ESA as a medium sized mission for launch in 2024. One of the requirements of the ballistic entry flight is to perform the descent and landing phase without using parachutes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The solution of the adjoint problem is the natural connection between the 13 linearisations of the residual and the considered objective functional. Con- 14 sequently, the adjoint system inherits all the potential inconsistencies lying 15 between the residual and the objective; either on the level of partial differen- 16 tial equations (PDE) when the continuous-adjoint problem is constructed in 17 a derive-then-discretise approach [14,15,25,28,26], or on the discrete level algebraic constraints (discretised governing equations) weighted by the cor-43 responding discrete-adjoint multipliers. Summation by parts, the discrete [5,7], Nielsen et al [20] have manually ensured primal-dual 57 equivalence throughout the iteration process of a linearised, unstructured 58 finite-volume Navier-Stokes method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%