1992
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.8.3516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The DnaK chaperone modulates the heat shock response of Escherichia coli by binding to the sigma 32 transcription factor.

Abstract: The heat shock response and the heat shock proteins have been conserved across evolution. In Escherichia coi, the heat shock response is positively regulated by the or32 transcriptional factor and negatively regulated by a subset of the heat shock proteins themselves. In an effort to understand the regulation of the heat shock response, we have purified the a 32 polypeptide to homogeneity. During the purification procedure, we found that a large fraction of the overexpressed a32 polypeptide copurifled with the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
220
0
3

Year Published

1993
1993
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
10
220
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The major host chaperones are not required for the proteolysis of CII and the stabilization of CII by CIII Proteolysis of 32 in vivo requires the presence of the DnaK-DnaJ-GrpE chaperone machine (Tilly et al, 1989;Straus et al, 1990;Liberek et al, 1992). In order to test whether host chaperones participate in CII proteolysis and in CIII activity, experiments were performed in isogenic strains carrying mutations affecting different heat-shock ᮊ 1997 Blackwell Science Ltd, Molecular Microbiology, 24, 1303-1310 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major host chaperones are not required for the proteolysis of CII and the stabilization of CII by CIII Proteolysis of 32 in vivo requires the presence of the DnaK-DnaJ-GrpE chaperone machine (Tilly et al, 1989;Straus et al, 1990;Liberek et al, 1992). In order to test whether host chaperones participate in CII proteolysis and in CIII activity, experiments were performed in isogenic strains carrying mutations affecting different heat-shock ᮊ 1997 Blackwell Science Ltd, Molecular Microbiology, 24, 1303-1310 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transcriptional activation of bacterial heat shock genes is regulated by the abundance of an alternate a factor, o2 (17,52). DnaK, the E. coli homolog of hsp70, together with DnaJ and GrpE, physically interacts with c2 (15, 28) and modulates its synthesis and stability (54,56). Negative regulation in S. cerevisiae involves HSF, since the overexpression of heat shock genes that occurs in yeast cells harboring hsp7O mutations can be abolished by mutating the HSE (7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DnaK/J/GrpE and GroEL/S chaperone machines each constitute a negative feedback loop that couples 32 activity to cellular protein folding state: overexpression of either chaperone machine decreases 32 activity; conversely, chaperone depletion or overexpression of chaperone substrates increases 32 activity (13)(14)(15)(16). The chaperones are likely to act directly on 32 because they bind to 32 and inhibit its activity in a purified in vitro transcription system (17)(18)(19). Regulated degradation of 32 is mediated by the FtsH protease and facilitated by DnaK/J/GrpE and GroEL/S in vivo, but this process has not been completely recapitulated in vitro, where degradation of 32 by FtsH is slow and not facilitated by chaperones (20,21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%