The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer 2002
DOI: 10.1017/ccol0521801931.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Doing of the Thing Itself

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, playing is serious, as opposed to the traditional view of play in the aesthetic tradition of Kant and Schiller, where play was seen as a way to escape reality. (Grondin, 2001; Figal, 2002). Gadamerian play is not a place of retreat from real life; on the contrary, play is a serious experience of being present in reality (Gadamer, 2004, pp.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, playing is serious, as opposed to the traditional view of play in the aesthetic tradition of Kant and Schiller, where play was seen as a way to escape reality. (Grondin, 2001; Figal, 2002). Gadamerian play is not a place of retreat from real life; on the contrary, play is a serious experience of being present in reality (Gadamer, 2004, pp.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although calling self-awareness “a flickering” may sound submissive, Gadamer does not deny individuality (Figal, 2002). Historicity refers to the framework within which individuality takes place.…”
Section: Hermeneutic Standards For Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An approach to interpreting Verbal Hallucinations, thus, ought to cohere with an analysis of the nature of language and understanding. It is for these reasons, I argue, that, in explicating the hermeneutic task of interpreting the content of VHs, we can fruitfully turn to Gadamer’s ontology of language, which, as Figal (2002) notes, “takes the path to that Being that language is through the experience of conversation” (p. 106).…”
Section: Toward a Hermeneutic Of Verbal Hallucinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Gadamer, it is in conversation that “one experiences what it is to be in language” (Figal, 2002, p. 106). Thus, an ontology of language must begin with an analysis of understanding as an event that occurs during conversation.…”
Section: Toward a Hermeneutic Of Verbal Hallucinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%