1984
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(84)90123-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dom project for the early detection of breast cancer, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the main part of this study we used 69 frozen urine samples from women who had participated in the DOM cohort (8). For the DOM study, overnight urine samples were collected, immediately frozen at intake, and questionnaires were filled in between 1974 and 1986.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the main part of this study we used 69 frozen urine samples from women who had participated in the DOM cohort (8). For the DOM study, overnight urine samples were collected, immediately frozen at intake, and questionnaires were filled in between 1974 and 1986.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of the number and type of these procedures used in the situation without screening were based on the following sources: general practitioners' registry (Trouw, 1986); the radioactivity and radiation application division of the Ministry of Welfare, Health and Cultural Affairs; the Central Office for the Administration of Specialists' Fees (De Waard et al, 1986); and the Steering Committee on Future Health Scenarios (1988).…”
Section: Assessment and Excision Biopsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The policy for this treatment was based on a reported file study of 52 patients with breast cancer metastases (De Waard et al, 1986).…”
Section: Assessment and Excision Biopsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cancers surface among negative screenees before the next scheduled examination would have taken place. Of all breast cancers in a screened population about 20-35% are diagnosed within 2 years after the last screening examination (Verbeek, 1985;Tabar et al, 1987;Moskowitz, 1986;de Waard et al, 1984; Lundgren, 1979). The survival of patients with interval cancers turned out to be just as bad as the survival of patients diagnosed outside screening programmes (Holmberg et al, 1986;Shapiro et al, 1982).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%