2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2007.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The domain of existence of prograde Rayleigh-wave particle motion for simple models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that, as remarked by Nakamura (2000) this large peak appears at a frequency slightly different (1.9) from the actual value of f 0 (2 Hz). Such a difference has been discussed by Malischewsky and Scherbaum (2004) on the basis of theoretical arguments and has been attributed to the properties of Rayleigh waves ellipticity (for a more general discussion about Rayleigh waves particle motion in simple subsoil configurations, see Malischewsky et al 2008).…”
Section: Comparison Of Theoretical Hvsr Deduced From Approximate and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that, as remarked by Nakamura (2000) this large peak appears at a frequency slightly different (1.9) from the actual value of f 0 (2 Hz). Such a difference has been discussed by Malischewsky and Scherbaum (2004) on the basis of theoretical arguments and has been attributed to the properties of Rayleigh waves ellipticity (for a more general discussion about Rayleigh waves particle motion in simple subsoil configurations, see Malischewsky et al 2008).…”
Section: Comparison Of Theoretical Hvsr Deduced From Approximate and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These questions turn out to be surprisingly challenging theoretically even for very simple model and they have only rarely been addressed in the literature (e.g. Malischewsky & Scherbaum 2004; Malischewsky et al . 2008 and Haghshenas et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth highlighting a few studies that look at contradictions to this assumption. First, prograde motion of the fundamental mode has been modeled (Mooney and Bolt, 1966;Tanimoto and Rivera, 2005;Malischewsky et al, 2008); however, these studies observed prograde motion at frequencies much lower than our investigation (0.1-0.3 Hz). Second, De Nil (2005) reports that higher modes can transition from prograde motion to retrograde motion at the surface at high frequencies, typically greater than 50 Hz.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Fundamental mode displacements at the free surface propagate almost exclusively in retrograde motion (Aki and Richards, 1980); however, for a few rare cases, there is a potential for prograde motion at frequencies ranging from 0.1 to 0.3 Hz in earth models (Mooney and Bolt, 1966;Tanimoto and Rivera, 2005;Malischewsky et al, 2008). The higher mode Rayleigh waves propagate in either retrograde or prograde motions (Jones et al, 1963); however, it has been found that higher modes commonly propagate in prograde motion below 50 Hz (De Nil, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%