The domestic political economy of upgrading in global value chains: how politics shapes pathways for upgrading in Rwanda’s coffee sector^*

Abstract

The Global Value Chains/Global Production Networks (GVC/GPNs) literatures have become the predominant international political economy frameworks to understand the challenge of economic upgrading under 21st century globalization. However, until recently, this literature has overlooked the role of the state (outside its regulatory responsibilities) and the explanatory power of domestic political economy. Meanwhile, literature on developmental states, industrial policy and political settlements has generally taken a methodologically nationalist perspective to examine economic transformation in developing countries. This article uses insights from the political settlements literature to contribute to the growing agenda within the GVC/GPNs literature to examine how the role of the state and domestic politics shape upgrading pathways in developing countries. Using the example of the Rwandan government's attempts to increase specialty coffee exports over the last two decades, the article shows how the public governance of the domestic value chain, combined with governance dynamics in the coffee GVC/GPN, has shaped upgrading pathways in Rwanda's coffee sector. By developing a domestic political economy approach within the GVC/GPN tradition, this article contributes to the growing attention within international political economy to focus on how multi-scalar pressures are shaping the outcomes of economic policy in developing countries. reviewers provided thoughtful comments that have improved this paper. Thanks also the RIPE editors and reviewers who provided extremely constructive comments. Early versions of this paper were presented in The

State policies and upgrading in global value chains: A systematic literature review

“…Another highly diffused instrument adopted by national policymakers is to provide incentives, subsidies or favorable taxes. Grants targeting local producers are often aimed at securing increased local value capture, raising local technological capabilities (e.g., upgrading the production techniques of coffee farmers in Rwanda -see Behuria, 2019); supporting the development of new industries (such as in the case of high-speed rails in China -see Bȃzȃvan, 2019); or even facilitating geographical delocalization (as in the case of the Chongquing region in China, where logistics subsidies were offered to local and foreign firms, to aid the creation of a supply base in the area -see Gao et al, 2019). Incentives targeting foreign firms are primarily oriented towards enhancing GVC participation, by attracting FDI.…”

Potential for Upgrading in Financialised Agri-food Chains: The Case of Ghanaian Cocoa

“…As the process of inclusion into global markets implies redrawing the boundaries of the market, it is also a process of exclusion. Although often overlooked, these considerations on downgrading and exclusion are of paramount importance to not only understanding the mixed evidence on outcomes of GVC inclusion but also the political economy of upgrading and motives of governments and other stakeholders to support and design upgrading strategies; see Behuria ( 2019 ).…”

Geographies of production II: Thinking through the state

“…In the context of global agrifood supply chains, Neilson and Pritchard (2011) have long argued that local and national political struggles and state interventions are central to the outcomes of upgrading projects. In a recent study, Behuria (2019) explores the changing roles played by the Rwandan state in its efforts to boost the country’s participation in value-added coffee networks. The analysis demonstrates that the state plays much more than a ‘facilitator role’ by investing directly in domestic coffee roasting as a producer.…”