2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.10.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dominance of Symmetry in the Evolution of Homo-oligomeric Proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Trimers and higher homo-oligomers of monotopic (and also of all other) membrane proteins should assume C n symmetry, which is rare for n greater than 2 because the development of such oligomers is entropically hampered. [31][32][33] In agreement with this rule, there is only 1 trimer (C 3 symmetry), 1 tetramer (C 4 symmetry) and no higher associations among the 34 distinct monotopic proteins. The observation corresponds well with soluble proteins, assuming rarely C n symmetry.…”
Section: Oligomerization and Asymmetric Contents Of Crystalssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Trimers and higher homo-oligomers of monotopic (and also of all other) membrane proteins should assume C n symmetry, which is rare for n greater than 2 because the development of such oligomers is entropically hampered. [31][32][33] In agreement with this rule, there is only 1 trimer (C 3 symmetry), 1 tetramer (C 4 symmetry) and no higher associations among the 34 distinct monotopic proteins. The observation corresponds well with soluble proteins, assuming rarely C n symmetry.…”
Section: Oligomerization and Asymmetric Contents Of Crystalssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…It was pointed out by Monod et al [10] that the effect of a single mutation in complexes with the close-packed form may be much greater than in complexes without dihedral symmetry. This effect may allow such complexes to evolve more readily by the efficient generation of favorable interactions, and this prediction has been supported by recent docking-simulation studies [11]–[13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…S3, B and C). In contrast, the vast majority of biological dimers are 2-fold symmetric (50,51) and also the 2:2 InlB/Met complex shows 2-fold symmetry. If this contact between two B-repeats were to stabilize a 2:2 InlB/Met complex, asymmetry would need to be introduced in the short linker between the end of the internalin domain and the start of the B-repeat, which is very unlikely.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%