1998
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.112.4.863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dorsal hippocampus is essential for context discrimination but not for contextual conditioning.

Abstract: The authors describe how (a) the timing of hippocampal lesions and (b) the behavioral-representational demands of the task affect the requirement for the hippocampus in contextual fear conditioning. Post- but not pretraining lesions of the hippocampus greatly reduced contextual fear conditioning. In contrast, pretraining lesions of the hippocampus abolished context discrimination, a procedure in which mice are trained to discriminate between 2 similar chambers (shock context vs. no-shock context). Whereas eith… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

38
400
8
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 437 publications
(448 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
38
400
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature indicates that neurotoxic damage to dorsal hippocampus before conditioning has little or no effect on the acquisition of contextual fear conditioning (Cho et al, 1999;Frankland et al, 1998;Maren et al, 1997;Richmond et al, 1999) but damage to the hippocampus following learning produces severe retrograde amnesia (Anagnostaras et al, 1999;Maren et al, 1997). This dissociation between anterograde and retrograde effects clearly parallels our current conclusions about elemental visual discriminations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The literature indicates that neurotoxic damage to dorsal hippocampus before conditioning has little or no effect on the acquisition of contextual fear conditioning (Cho et al, 1999;Frankland et al, 1998;Maren et al, 1997;Richmond et al, 1999) but damage to the hippocampus following learning produces severe retrograde amnesia (Anagnostaras et al, 1999;Maren et al, 1997). This dissociation between anterograde and retrograde effects clearly parallels our current conclusions about elemental visual discriminations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…whereas tone conditioning requires the sampling of only one cue (e.g., Rudy 1996;Anagnostaras et al 1995). This is still somewhat similar to the role we have proposed for the hippocampus in contextual fear conditioning, which we have argued forms the contextual CS by assembling multiple cues into a single spatial or configural representation Young et al 1994;Maren et al 1998;Frankland et al 1998;Anagnostaras et al 1999). Nonetheless, ruling out the less exciting possibility that scopolamine produced deficits through purely sensory disturbance will require further investigation.…”
Section: Scopolamine and Cs Processingsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Not all studies find that lesions of the hippocampus affect context conditioning (Frankland et al 1998;McNish et al 1997;Winocur 1997). Recent preclinical evidence indicates that context conditioning is hippocampus-dependent for complex but not simple environments (Moses et al 2007).…”
Section: Context Conditioningmentioning
confidence: 99%