1997
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1997.287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dose-response relationship between cigarette consumption, biochemical markers and risk of lung cancer

Abstract: Summary The relationship between the number of cigarettes smoked per day and the incidence of lung cancer is linear but, from the multistage model of carcinogenesis, it should be quadratic (upwards curving). We investigated this anomaly in a study of 11 403 male never smokers and current smokers in whom carboxyhaemoglobin (COHb) (Day and Brown, 1980). If there are k stages, it can be shown that the incidence of a cancer after time t will be proportional to t1-', and so the plot of the logarithm of age-speci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
65
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the correlation analysis, urinary cotinine levels were associated with both the number of cigarettes smoked per day and the FTND scores, which was consistent with previous studies (Heatherton et al, 1991;Payne et al, 1994;Law et al, 1997;Caraballo et al, 1998;Park et al, 2004;Blackford et al, 2006). In contrast to previous reports that showed that the duration of smoking was not associated with the FTND scores (John et al, 2003;Park et al, 2004), the degree of nicotine dependence increased according to the total smoking period in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the correlation analysis, urinary cotinine levels were associated with both the number of cigarettes smoked per day and the FTND scores, which was consistent with previous studies (Heatherton et al, 1991;Payne et al, 1994;Law et al, 1997;Caraballo et al, 1998;Park et al, 2004;Blackford et al, 2006). In contrast to previous reports that showed that the duration of smoking was not associated with the FTND scores (John et al, 2003;Park et al, 2004), the degree of nicotine dependence increased according to the total smoking period in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…How quickly to smoke after awakening in the morning has been regarded as a strong marker of nicotine dependence, because highly dependent smokers have lower tolerability to depleted plasma nicotine levels on waking (Heatherton et al, 1991;Baker et al, 2007). Other reports showed a dose-dependent relationship between cotinine levels and the number of cigarettes smoked per day, another measure of the FTND (Law et al, 1997;Blackford et al, 2006;Fu et al, 2012). Moreover, several previous reports showed a significant relationship between the degree of nicotine dependence (as assessed by the total FTND score) and cotinine levels (Heatherton et al, 1991;Payne et al, 1994;Pomerleau et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…1D), and that this relationship seemed to be influenced mainly by the two extreme groups (0-5 and >30 CPD), suggesting that the heaviest smokers inhale each cigarette with less intensity compared with those smoking the least CPD. This has also been seen in the relationship between daily cigarette consumption and carboxyhemoglobin levels measured in plasma (45). Our results indicated that plasma cotinine showed the strongest correlation with CO levels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The values of COHb found in northern elephant seals from this study are higher than values in humans that smoke ≥40 cigarettes per day (Law et al, 1997) and comparable to the highest recorded endogenous values (9.7% COHb) found in a critically ill human patient with hemolytic anemia (Hampson, 2007) (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%