2017
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.1953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The double edge to parasite escape: invasive host is less infected but more infectable

Abstract: Abstract. Nonnative species that escape their native-range parasites may benefit not only from reduced infection pathology, but also from relaxed selection on costly immune defenses, promoting reallocation of resources toward growth or reproduction. However, benefits accruing from a reduction in defense could come at the cost of increased infection susceptibility. We conducted common garden studies of the shore crab Hemigrapsus sanguineus from highly parasitized native (Japan) populations and largely parasite-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the largest pillars of invasion ecology is understanding what happens to parasite faunas when host species become established in a new region (Keogh et al 2017;Kołodziej-Sobocińska et al 2018a;Laurimaa et al 2016;Poulin 2017;Stricker et al 2016). Commonly debated questions include: Which parasites are prevalent in native ranges but absent in new territories, and vice versa?…”
Section: Non-native Invasive Mammal Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the largest pillars of invasion ecology is understanding what happens to parasite faunas when host species become established in a new region (Keogh et al 2017;Kołodziej-Sobocińska et al 2018a;Laurimaa et al 2016;Poulin 2017;Stricker et al 2016). Commonly debated questions include: Which parasites are prevalent in native ranges but absent in new territories, and vice versa?…”
Section: Non-native Invasive Mammal Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…INNS that escape their native range may benefit not only from reduced parasite pressure at the beginning of the invasion, but also from relaxed selection for costly immune response, which promotes reallocation of available resources toward growth, reproduction, and survival. As a result, invasive hosts may be less infected but-on the other hand-more susceptible to infection due to the weakening of defense mechanisms (Keogh et al 2017).…”
Section: Non-native Invasive Mammal Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even more important are the indirect effects by the reduced need to invest in parasite defense, allowing organisms to reallocate those resources to traits like growth or reproduction (Goedknegt et al 2016). Reduced investment in parasite defense, however, results in higher susceptibility to parasite infections, which may in turn negatively impact establishment success (Keogh et al 2016). Introduced non-native parasites, on the other hand, can reach extreme invasion success when they are able to infect native species which are closely related to their original host, but have only weak defensive traits due to the lack of coevolution (examples in Ruiz et al 1999;Feis et al 2016).…”
Section: Competition Facilitation and Parasitism -Species' Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While R. harrisii has been introduced to many global regions, in all of these cases it appears that L. panopaei has not yet followed it (Fofonoff, Ruiz, Steves, Simkanin, & Carlton, 2019;Fowler, Forsström, von Numers, & Vesakosk, 2013 (Phillips et al, 2010;Keogh, Miura, Nishimura, & Byers, 2017). Thus, the existence of multiple host introductions from multiple sources, with a variety of histories of parasitism, provides a uniquely promising system in which to explore the potential influence of host-parasite coevolution on biological introductions.…”
Section: Coevolution and Biological Introductionsmentioning
confidence: 99%