2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The double-edged sword of identification. The divergent effects of identification on acculturation stress among Ukrainian immigrants in Poland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained in this study contribute to our understanding of group identity as having separate components with different consequences for individuals' cognition, emotions, and behaviors. In line with other studies (Bilewicz & Wo ´jcik, 2010;Bilewicz et al, 2021;Bombay et al, 2010Bombay et al, , 2013, we propose that high group centrality be considered a risk factor in anxiety, whereas strong group ties act as a protective factor against anxious responses to epidemic illnesses. This might have some obvious applied consequences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results obtained in this study contribute to our understanding of group identity as having separate components with different consequences for individuals' cognition, emotions, and behaviors. In line with other studies (Bilewicz & Wo ´jcik, 2010;Bilewicz et al, 2021;Bombay et al, 2010Bombay et al, , 2013, we propose that high group centrality be considered a risk factor in anxiety, whereas strong group ties act as a protective factor against anxious responses to epidemic illnesses. This might have some obvious applied consequences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A study among Aboriginal people in Canada found high ingroup centrality to cause anxious appraisals of potential future acts of discrimination (Bombay et al, 2013). In a similar vein, studies among two groups of Ukrainian immigrants in Poland showed that higher ingroup centrality was related to higher levels of acculturation stress associated with discrimination, intercultural relations, cultural isolation, language skills, and work challenges; whereas stronger ingroup ties and more positive ingroup affect reduced acculturation stress in most of these domains (Bilewicz et al, 2021).…”
Section: How Different Aspects Of Identification Affectmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Another point might be that the people who possess the mental strength to migrate have a greater sense of coherence, resourcefulness and are more resilient [ 75 , 76 ], so that their responses are more positive. Paradoxically, increasing stigmatization may also enhance bonds within a group of migrants, especially those speaking the same language, and thus reduce the level of stress associated with acculturation [ 77 ]. For the LGBT+ group, being in a more tolerant place than their homeland could also be a relief from some personal burdens, for example by making it easier to form new relationships without a fear of exposure to harassment, as could be the case in their country of origin [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the LGBT+ group, being in a more tolerant place than their homeland could also be a relief from some personal burdens, for example by making it easier to form new relationships without a fear of exposure to harassment, as could be the case in their country of origin [ 28 ]. The above should be considered in the context of three distinct dimensions of social identification: centrality (the importance of the group to the self), ingroup affect (the value ascribed to being a member of the group) and ingroup ties (attachment to other members of the group) [ 77 , 78 ]. Physical and mental health outcomes are significantly associated with social identification as a positive predictor of group-derived efficacy and individual self-efficacy [ 79 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among AIDS patients' ingroup centrality was negatively related to self‐efficacy, while ingroup ties were positively related to self‐efficacy (Harris et al, 2011). Studies of Ukrainian immigrants in Poland showed that strong ingroup ties are linked to lower acculturation stress (Bilewicz et al, 2021) and lower levels of anxiety in stressful situations (Bilewicz et al, 2022), whereas other aspects of identity did not have such positive role. Studies analyzing intergroup relations (Obst et al, 2011) found that ingroup centrality leads to greater intergroup discrimination, whereas ingroup ties and affect enhance collective self‐esteem without causing damage to intergroup relations.…”
Section: Three Facets Of Superordinate Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%