We investigate the effects of communication networks focused inside and outside the team on both team and multiteam systems (MTSs) identification and the effect of team and MTS identification on MTS creativity. Method: We use a sample of 334 individuals working in 128 project teams embedded in 32 MTSs. Participants took part in an 8-week project (M age = 21; 53% females) that linked courses in Environmental Ecology, Social Psychology, and Innovation Management in two U.S.-based universities and France-based university. Psychometric measures include communication networks and team and MTS identification. Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) rated creativity of the final deliverable. Results: We find that between-team communication benefits MTS identification (β = .55, p < .001), but exhibits a negative curvilinear effect on team identification (β = −.31, p = .014). Within-team communication benefits team identification (β = .43, p = .003) without harming MTS identification (β = .11, p = .444). Additionally, we find a crossed interaction effect in predicting MTS creativity (β = .39, p = .006). MTSs with component teams that identified strongly with the team and system produced novel and useful ideas, but MTSs with low dual identification also demonstrated strong creativity. Conclusion: The emergence of social identification can result from the bottom-up influence of interpersonal interaction among group members. Additionally, the development of relationships between teams affects how the team develops internally. Finally, findings paint a complex picture of the identification-creativity relationship.
Highlights and Implications• The density of communication networks within teams was positively related to team identification, and the density of communication networks within teams was positively related to multiteam systems (MTSs) identification. This suggests that dyadic relations can build collective identification from the bottom up.• Within-team communication does not affect identification with the MTS, but between-team communication ties had a negative curvilinear relationship with This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.