2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The drinking water treatment process as a potential source of affecting the bacterial antibiotic resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With the wide use of antibiotics in human and veterinary medicine and the agricultural industry, ARGs have been detected in a variety of environments, including surface river water [1], municipal wastewater treatment plants (MWTPs) [4], drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) [5], and water supply reservoirs [6]. Notably, growing evidence shows the existence of ARB and ARGs in drinking water systems from source water to finished water [5,[7][8][9][10]. Since finished water from DWTPs is provided to local populations, the prevalence of ARGs in drinking water systems can be a potential threat to public health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the wide use of antibiotics in human and veterinary medicine and the agricultural industry, ARGs have been detected in a variety of environments, including surface river water [1], municipal wastewater treatment plants (MWTPs) [4], drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) [5], and water supply reservoirs [6]. Notably, growing evidence shows the existence of ARB and ARGs in drinking water systems from source water to finished water [5,[7][8][9][10]. Since finished water from DWTPs is provided to local populations, the prevalence of ARGs in drinking water systems can be a potential threat to public health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the literature review, the volumes of fresh water and tap water used in DNA extraction procedures varied widely: from 15 L [49], through 10÷15 L depending on the sample contamination and possible clogging of membrane [51], 4 L [57], 2÷1 L [58][59][60], 1.5 L [61] to 500 ml [14] or 450 mL [42], depending on the sample origin. However, drinking water samples obtained by other researchers could have been affected by the biofilm dwelling in the taps.…”
Section: Extraction Of Dna Directly From Tap Water -A Preliminary Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technologies presently applied in water treatment plants do not provide the sufficient ARGs removing levels [11,16,51,57]. The proposed improvements may be the increase in dosages of chlorine and the intensity of UV irradiation or sequential UV/chlorination [9], but these solutions generate high costs.…”
Section: Considered Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other metals (e.g., manganese) could become a problem by accumulating over time [11] needing special attention during treatment and transport of drinking water [47]. On the other hand the water treatment process itself may affect water quality, adding disinfection by products [48] or even affecting the bacterial antibiotic resistance [49]. Therefore prevention of eutrophication and diminishing surface water quality should have a preference over additional treatment [50].…”
Section: Effect Of Artificial Recharge With River Water and Of Air Blmentioning
confidence: 99%