Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Theory, Responsibility and Engagement
DOI: 10.9774/gleaf.978-1-909493-28-5_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The drivers of stakeholder engagement: Reflections on the case of Royal Dutch/Shell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
8

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
34
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its uniqueness, the case shares striking similarities with that of Brent Spar in the 1990s 1 (see e.g. Barbone, 1996;Lawrence, 2002;Tsoukas, 1999;van Tulder and van der Zwart, 2006). Both cases started as a local incidence, but evolved to an intergovernmental conflict.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Despite its uniqueness, the case shares striking similarities with that of Brent Spar in the 1990s 1 (see e.g. Barbone, 1996;Lawrence, 2002;Tsoukas, 1999;van Tulder and van der Zwart, 2006). Both cases started as a local incidence, but evolved to an intergovernmental conflict.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Yet, scholars recognize that firms may identify different stakeholders depending on their culture (Jones et al 2007), their own life cycle (Fineman and Clarke 1996), and the industry context (Jawahar and McLaughlin 2001). Moreover, they may engage in different ways with stakeholders depending on their motivation and capacity (Lawrence 2002) and their leadership (Maak 2007).…”
Section: Partnerships and Stakeholder Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing conclusions from a single case study is inherently risky (Lawrence, 2002) and a single case study approach does not allow for generalization to a population (Blaikie, 2000). However, Hillebrand and colleagues (2001, pp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%