1979
DOI: 10.1080/00926237908403732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The DSFI: A multidimensional measure of sexual functioning

Abstract: The present report summarizes work to date on the Derogatis Sexual Functioning Inventory (DSFI), a multidimensional measure of human sexual functioning. We discuss the rationale for the test as well as the selection of the primary domains of measurement. Reliability coefficients for the various subtests are given, and a review section on validation studies is provided, including a factor analysis, predictive validation, and discriminant function analyses. Prototypic clinical profiles are also provided for seve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
275
1
21

Year Published

1985
1985
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 579 publications
(299 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
275
1
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants provided a global evaluation of their current sexual life (Derogatis & Melisaratos, 1979) using a 9-point scale ranging from 0 (could not be worse) to 8 (could not be better). Previous research has demonstrated that this global evaluation is sensitive to pre-to post-cancer treatment effects (Andersen et al, 1989a;Andersen, Woods, & Copeland, 1997).…”
Section: Global Sexual Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants provided a global evaluation of their current sexual life (Derogatis & Melisaratos, 1979) using a 9-point scale ranging from 0 (could not be worse) to 8 (could not be better). Previous research has demonstrated that this global evaluation is sensitive to pre-to post-cancer treatment effects (Andersen et al, 1989a;Andersen, Woods, & Copeland, 1997).…”
Section: Global Sexual Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composite variables consisted of questions adapted from an unpublished questionnaire developed by Grenier and Byers (1997), including, for example, questions about ejaculation latency time, trying to speed up or delay intercourse, and feeling of control, higher values indicating more problems with ejaculatory function. Frequencies of sexual behaviors were assessed using a modified version of Section III from the DSFI (Derogatis & Melisaratos, 1979). Participants were asked how frequently they engage in sexual fantasies, kissing and petting, masturbation, oral sex, vaginal intercourse, and anal intercourse using a nine-point scale where 0 = not at all and 9 = ≥4 times a day.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale behind the body image subscale is that body image is related to sexual functioning and the ability to achieve relaxed sexual relationships. The body image subscale of the DSFI has been shown to correlate highly (.74) with global sexual satisfaction (Derogatis & Melisaratos, 1979). In addition to the DSFI items, items from a questionnaire about the body and sexual self-image (Hampson, 2000) were used.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Contemporary research has addressed the QOL implications of ED for subjects and partners, using different tools. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] However, the understanding, validity and meaningfulness of the published findings may be limited by differences in methodological approaches and in the characteristics of instruments used for assessing QOL. Moreover, instruments usually provide useful information for diagnostic purposes and on treatment efficacy, but fail to address subject-perceived psychosocial concerns related to perception of ED.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength and originality of this questionnaire is that subjects were asked on perceived achievement, satisfaction and importance with regard to each item measured. Moreover, QVS measures the impact of ED on social life and well-being in contrast with other questionnaires, which usually focus on sexual function [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] (Appendix 1). Consequently, as the QVS is not only specific to sexuality but also comprises a more general part (social life, well-being), it can be used in subjects without ED so as to compare responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%