2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000162519.25430.1a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ???Duck??? Modification of the Tensor Fascia Lata Flap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A limitation identified in their study was the instability of the T junction where the middle of the TFL flap met the donor site. Aslan et al 44 reported similar findings. In an attempt to avoid wound dehiscence, all 5 patients in our study were treated with NPWT postoperatively to allow splinting of the surgical site at the points of inadvertent tension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…A limitation identified in their study was the instability of the T junction where the middle of the TFL flap met the donor site. Aslan et al 44 reported similar findings. In an attempt to avoid wound dehiscence, all 5 patients in our study were treated with NPWT postoperatively to allow splinting of the surgical site at the points of inadvertent tension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]19,20 The majority of studies report on the authors' experience with a new technique or provide a description of the management of particularly complicated cases (recurrent ulcers, severely scarred tissue, patients with cerebrovascular disease). [13][14][15][16][17][18] The largest study published to date involved a review of 598 PUs in 415 patients. 19 In this retrospective study, Schryvers and colleagues 19 examined 421 flap reconstructions and demonstrated partial flap necrosis or wound dehiscence in 31% of patients and 31% same site recurrence rate with a mean follow-up of 52 months.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several modifications of the TFL flap have been developed to overcome the mentioned drawbacks. [3][4][5][6][7] The subcutaneous pedicle flap not only overcomes these well known disadvantages of the classical TFL flap, but also has additional advantages mostly concerning the cosmetic appearance of both donor and reconstructed sites. In this report, we described our experiences with the use of the subcutaneous pedicled TFL flap for reconstruction of trochanteric pressure sore defects.…”
Section: The Subcutaneous Pedicle Tensor Fasciamentioning
confidence: 99%