2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-015-9744-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ductility-based strength reduction factor for the mainshock–aftershock sequence-type ground motions

Abstract: This manuscript investigates the strength reduction factor of single degree of freedom system with constant ductility performance subjected to the mainshock-aftershock sequence-type ground motions. The recorded and artificial sequence-type ground motions are used. The aftershock ground motions in sequence are scaled to have different relative intensity levels. Four hysteretic models are used to simulate the different type of structures. The effects of period, ductility factor, site condition, aftershock, hyste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ruiz‐García, [ 2 ] Goda, [ 3 ] and Goda et al [ 4 ] studied the differences in characteristics between a mainshock and major aftershock records, providing useful insights into the MSAS records selection or generation. The response spectra of MSAS sequences were proposed for the performance evaluation [ 5–9 ] and seismic design [ 10–14 ] after considering the effects of aftershocks. The influence of MSAS sequences on the seismic response of buildings, mainly including steel frames [ 15–18 ] and reinforced concrete (RC) frames, [ 19–21 ] was also investigated with recorded or artificial MSAS sequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ruiz‐García, [ 2 ] Goda, [ 3 ] and Goda et al [ 4 ] studied the differences in characteristics between a mainshock and major aftershock records, providing useful insights into the MSAS records selection or generation. The response spectra of MSAS sequences were proposed for the performance evaluation [ 5–9 ] and seismic design [ 10–14 ] after considering the effects of aftershocks. The influence of MSAS sequences on the seismic response of buildings, mainly including steel frames [ 15–18 ] and reinforced concrete (RC) frames, [ 19–21 ] was also investigated with recorded or artificial MSAS sequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] which explain that multi-story moment resisting frames experience extensively damage due to multiple earthquake in comparison with the single earthquake effect. Recent studies regarding repeated earthquake are conducted using single degree of freedom system by Zhai et al [7,8] in order to investigates the damage and the reduction factor. Hatzivassiliou and Hatzigeorgiou [9] evaluates the extensive damage of RC frames due to repeated earthquakes in more detail using three dimensional model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last decade, many researchers have paid their attentions to the effects of seismic sequence or multiple events on the structural performance. Lots of works have been conducted to study the engineering problems related to the MSAS sequences, including ground motion characteristics of MSAS sequences, response spectra of MSAS ground motions, and effects of aftershocks on the damage of multiple degrees of freedoms (MDOF) structures …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last decade, many researchers have paid their attentions to the effects of seismic sequence or multiple events on the structural performance. Lots of works have been conducted to study the engineering problems related to the MSAS sequences, including ground motion characteristics of MSAS sequences, 1 response spectra of MSAS ground motions, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and effects of aftershocks on the damage of multiple degrees of freedoms (MDOF) structures. How to accurately and quickly estimate the cumulative damage induced by MSAS sequences is the key step in the process of incorporating the aftershocks into seismic design and resilience assessment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%