The duelling models: NEG vs amenity migration in explaining US engines of growth

Abstract

The new economic geography (NEG) has become a mainstay of regional science in the last two decades, as signified by the awarding of Paul Krugman, the Nobel Prize. Yet, most American regional scientists and urban/regional economists do not use NEG in determining regional growth patterns. Instead, they rely on factors such as natural amenity migration, whose roots lie back to the work of Philip Graves in the mid 1970s. Conversely, two of the world's leading economic geographers - Allen Scott and Michael Storper - have strongly argued that job availability not household amenities have determined US regional dynamics. Given the disparity of views over the largest developed economy in the world, we hold a competition to determine which of these leading contenders accurately predict US interregional growth dynamics over the last 40-60 years. The runaway winner of the duel is natural amenity led growth with the crown going to Graves. Implications are drawn for both empirical research and EU economic integration. Copyright (c) 2010 the author(s). Journal compilation (c) 2010 RSAI.

Industry life cycles of a resource town in Finland – the case of Lieksa

“…As cold, remote peripheral areas are not the target areas of young generations (Tuhkunen, 2007) or amenity migration (Partridge, 2010), there are no factors that could compensate for the high costs of remoteness. According to Lehtonen and Tykkyläinen (2012), through investments in innovations, technologies, and labour quality and skills, developing industries benefiting from rural economies and the promotion of life-style changes could slow down rural job decline.…”

Do we follow the money? The drivers of migration across regions in the EU

“…Florida 2002, Ferguson et al 2007, Partridge 2010, Rodríguez-Pose, Ketterer 2012. The beauty and accessibility of the natural environment or the vibrancy of a region's cultural life has been highlighted as potentially a key component in the attraction of talent and skills (Partridge 2010), although this role may be waning (Partridge et al 2012). …”

Do earnings by college major affect graduate migration?

“…It appears that the factors that affect college graduate birth-state out-migration do so at a relatively early age and are quite persistent, increasing the importance of better understanding the location decisions of young recent college graduates. Obviously, California and Texas both have large populations with relatively warm winters, while Alaska and Wyoming are sparsely populated with cold winters, and these outmigration rates could reflect broader long-term trends in migration towards areas with better amenities (Rappaport 2007;Partridge 2010;Rickman and Rickman 2011). However, the determinants of birth-state out-migration rates are still less than fully understood.…”